Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Australia/Assessment/Requests: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Australia | Assessment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:24, 30 August 2007 editThin Arthur (talk | contribs)305 edits August 2007: Victorian general election, 2010 - importance=mid and politics-importance=mid based on similar articles← Previous edit Revision as of 23:12, 1 September 2007 edit undoWraithcraze (talk | contribs)53 edits Current requests for assessmentNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
Please add your request for an assessment to the top of the list. Fulfilled requests may be removed by any editor. Please add your request for an assessment to the top of the list. Fulfilled requests may be removed by any editor.


===September 2007===

===={{la|Ipswich Cougars}}====
I believe that this page deserves a ranking, it hasn't been ranked yet. ] 23:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)


===August 2007=== ===August 2007===

Revision as of 23:12, 1 September 2007

WikiProject Australia's request for assessment focuses on assessing the quality of Misplaced Pages's Australia-related articles. If you have made significant changes to an Australia-related article and would like an outside opinion or a new assessment rating, please feel free to list it below.

If you are interested in more extensive comments on an article, please use the peer review department instead.

Instructions

  1. Add your assessment request to the list of awaiting requests using the example below.
  2. Under your header, place a few comments relating to your request.
  3. Sign your request with four tildes ~~~~ and save
  4. Assessors: Please review awaiting requests and update the article's talk page template with your assessment.

Example

===={{la|article}}====
Comments relating to your request for an article assessment go here. ~~~~


Please place new requests at the top of each section.

This is not the place to discuss article assessment disputes. If you dispute an assessment, please use the Disputes section.

Current requests for assessment

Please add your request for an assessment to the top of the list. Fulfilled requests may be removed by any editor.

September 2007

Ipswich Cougars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I believe that this page deserves a ranking, it hasn't been ranked yet. Wraithcraze 23:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

August 2007

Coffs Harbour Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I believe due to recent updates and additions, the airport deserves an actual ranking, as it hasn't been assessed yet. tomauer 06:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Nerang State High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I believe it could be worthy of a mid-importance, due to its musical events and facilities. I am wondering of its quality, as I would like to know how it stands as of now. Hpfan9374 12:06, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

July 2007

Ongerup, Western Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Ive updated this page based on previous review comments. Is this worthy of an upgrade or is further work needed? 220.253.141.70 14:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Categories: