Misplaced Pages

User:Ludvikus/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Ludvikus Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 01:17, 3 October 2007 editLudvikus (talk | contribs)21,211 edits {{cleanup}}← Previous edit Revision as of 02:14, 3 October 2007 edit undoRHaworth (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users118,796 editsm moved Categories:Controversial literature to User:Ludvikus/sandboxNext edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 02:14, 3 October 2007

You must add a |reason= parameter to this Cleanup template – replace it with {{Cleanup|reason=<Fill reason here>}}, or remove the Cleanup template.

This category is for stub articles relating to Controversial literature. You can help by expanding them.
To add an article to this category, use {{Controversial literature-stub}} instead of {{stub}}.

This category is for stub articles about Controversial literature. It is not for stubs of historical articles, nor is it for historical novels.


Categories:Controversial literature includes items which are deemed generally unacceptable, untrue, often hateful, but have attained some historical significance to be retained by research libraries, museums, and other institutions, not for their intrinsic value, but for their impact in history, for incidental research into the circumstance under which they affected religious institutions, cultures, civilizations, or for mere curiosity's sake. The Library of congress is one institution which utilizes such a classification for its holdings.

The Library of Congress currently holds and classifie 5,214 of its items under this category. See: .

Also see

Stub icon

This article about a book is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: