Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fredrick day: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:22, 13 October 2007 editWikipedical (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers23,471 edits AFD signature: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 10:00, 15 October 2007 edit undoStsfi (talk | contribs)14 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 12: Line 12:


Don't know if you noticed, but look at how you signed your vote at ] (writing out of amusement not annoyance). -- ] 01:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC) Don't know if you noticed, but look at how you signed your vote at ] (writing out of amusement not annoyance). -- ] 01:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

== Malicious editing ==

I'm not going to make a personal attack on you; however, you have violated Wiki's editorial guidelines regarding three edits in a 24-hour period. The information and pages we have created meet Wiki's criteria. The project is spearheaded by two disabled individuals. If you continue to delete our pages and information, Wiki will be liable for discrimination. We will file a complaint with the city commission on human rights and persue legal action against Wiki (and youself if you are an American) since you have engaged in this behavior before. I am asking you to cease and desist any further edits to pages or information with my username attached. Thank you. --

Revision as of 10:00, 15 October 2007

FAQ to question that people might ask me - read before you post (under construction)

  1. Why are you biased against subject X? - I frankly don't care what subject X is - I'm only concerned that content meets core wikipedia policy, so if you are going to give me a long lecture on Haters or bias - save your energy, I'm not interested.
  2. Why don't I tell you how we should apply a lower standard of referencing and sourcing with this marginal subject I'm interested in? No, please don't because I'm not interested in hearing it.
  3. I have a source for my article, it's something I published myself, that helps right? No.
  4. I've been here a day and let me tell you that.. no, please don't, 99/100 times, your problem with wikipedia is because it's not what you think it should be or what you would like it to be. Take it up with the complaints department not me.
  5. I'd like to make a personal attack on you? feel free, it just shows how weak your case is when you have to resort to that.

Start below and post at the bottom of the page

AFD signature

Don't know if you noticed, but look at how you signed your vote at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of broadcasting data for Rome (TV series) (writing out of amusement not annoyance). -- Wikipedical 01:22, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Malicious editing

I'm not going to make a personal attack on you; however, you have violated Wiki's editorial guidelines regarding three edits in a 24-hour period. The information and pages we have created meet Wiki's criteria. The project is spearheaded by two disabled individuals. If you continue to delete our pages and information, Wiki will be liable for discrimination. We will file a complaint with the city commission on human rights and persue legal action against Wiki (and youself if you are an American) since you have engaged in this behavior before. I am asking you to cease and desist any further edits to pages or information with my username attached. Thank you. --