| Revision as of 08:01, 16 October 2007 editV-train (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,130 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:50, 17 October 2007 edit undoOphois (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,253 edits →Heroes infoboxNext edit → | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
| :The simplest way to fix it would be to change "Actor" back to "portrayer" on their pages.] 23:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | :The simplest way to fix it would be to change "Actor" back to "portrayer" on their pages.] 23:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::No, I meant change "Actor" back to "Potrayer". "Actor" doesn't correspond with anything in the infobox, whereas "Portrayer" does. ] 05:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | ::No, I meant change "Actor" back to "Potrayer". "Actor" doesn't correspond with anything in the infobox, whereas "Portrayer" does. ] 05:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::It may sound better, but there's apparently no corresponding spot on the infobox for "Actor".] 02:50, 17 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Another Happy Product of our educational system== | ==Another Happy Product of our educational system== | ||
Revision as of 02:50, 17 October 2007
 | This user values third opinions and occasionally provides one. |
 | Caveat This user reserves the right to be more fun than you. |
| File:Skull logo.jpg | CruftEater™ Local 665 Eating cruft since 2007 |
| Howdy! Click here to leave a new message. Rude messages will be deleted at my whim. |
|---|
What was archivedMidnighterNah, it's cool, I understand. I agree that you shouldn't have removed that source I added. Conversely, I shouldn't have removed that tag you placed on the JLA reference, as that was one I should've left in, but neglected to do so. There is also some other unsourced material that I've attempted to source, and yet other that I simply removed. Unfortunately, although I've read some of the comics that would source some of this stuff, I don't own them, so I was only able to satisfy some of those tags. Thanks for collaborating with me. :-) Nightscream 22:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
ConfusedI'm not entirely sure what you're asking. Mind, I've just woken up. Is this a particular article? Maybe if I saw what was going on I'd be able to think of what I'd do.~Zythe 10:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Butcher CoverArc, Check out my discussion page about the Butcher Cover. I think you'll agree with me on this one. This person is bent on calling the top caption of the picture of the butcher cover "the Alternate Cover." I worded it as the Original Cover Design. Sixstring1965 16:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Arc, Plesse keep an eye on my discussion. This one doesn't get it. I think you understand exactly where I'm coming from on this one.Sixstring1965 21:06, 8 October 2007 (UTC) IMDbGeneral WP:V and WP:RS. We cannot verify their information, as it comes from editors who submit it. There may be something about over at WP:FILMS, or WP:MOSFILMS, but I'm not sure. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 00:51, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Also, The Seeker bombed so badly at the box office. I guess all the POV-contributing fanboys were right that the adaptation would be FUBAR. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 04:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Re: Question about the Gathering kick-offHm, actually, no, I can't. The season 1 booklet only says that "the very existence of this series is somewhat incongruous with the ending of the first film," and there's Joe in "The Watchers" telling Duncan, "your kinsman Connor MacLeod, he did us all a big favor when he got rid of him," and that's about all I can find about The Kurgan in the series, to the best of my knowledge. In season 1, from the pilot onwards, it's pretty obvious to everyone in the series that it is the Gathering and nothing in particular triggered it; again, to the best of my knowledge. I'm gonna remove that sentence. Thanks for pointing this out to me, and have a nice day. Rosenknospe 11:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC) Heavy BrotherThe only person still keeping this alive is you. That user did exactly what I told them to: ceased using that account immediately upon finding out that it was not allowed as a single-purpose account. There have been no contributions since 9/25 from that account. This matter is closed. There is no further need for you to keep this alive. - Philippe | Talk 14:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC) LennonI cropped it from a current commons image using photoshop so it shouldn't be a problem. I'm only too aware of our image policy trust me!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 09:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC) I didn't even look at the licensing. Judging by how tough the Commons are on images I figured if it wasn't a legitimate image it would have been deleted by now ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 19:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC) It states the source is from http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/index-e.html where taken by the government it has been released into the public domain. Now you may want to verify this, really the commons should have sorted this image by now and to decide whether it is valid. I just cropped what I saw as a commons image last night to try to improve the article of the great John Lennon. Perhaps I was dreaming about shagging Lucy Pinder in the sky with diamonds too much!!! (Diamonds being used to fuel my Kreblakistani laser beam to extertiminate the white house) I would ask Videmus who did a lot with images but I think he has left wikipedia temporarily. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 19:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC) I think the commons are always very strict on removing images where it is clear we cannot use them. I guess they were tagged that way for a reason as probably admin on there were indecisive either way. out of courtesy I just replicated what was there before to avoid any misunderstanding. Now I have to go back to shagging Lucy Pinder in the magma in my volcano. All the best, Adios ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 20:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC) OH indeed they are all very fit. Eva Longoria, etc etc. Note though I do like my pussy to be white and fluffy though (if you catch my Mr. Bigglesworth drift). LOL! Natalie Portman had to be about the only woman in the world who didn't look terrible with a baldy. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 20:15, 10 October 2007 (UTC) P.S top stuff on the 300 film. It is a great article. Best regards baldy ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 20:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC) Another image of Lennon. I happened to be readin the John Kerry article has came across an unlikely image of him with Lennon. So I cropped and enhanced it ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 13:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Yes it could do with some photoshop work it wasn't the clearest of images anyway but a good find nonetheless and a significant one in relation to his anti war major involvement. I have always found John Kerry decent - much better than that weasel George W. As my mother always said Never trust a guy with slitty eyes! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ 14:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC) The Blair Witch ProjectMaybe mention it on the talk page of the article next time? ;-) -- JediLofty 14:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC) Heroes templateI think this may be what you want - not sure though. I didn't know you're part of the Heroes project as well; how long have you been here? asyndeton 16:48, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Heroes Infobox.Not sure what you're asking for. Do you mean something like:"Where in the template code do I find the codes for colors so I can change them from something pretty and graphic-designy to something staid and encyclopedic", or do you mean, where is, among all the tempaltes for Heroes WIkiproject, the one that's black and white, so I can invert it? If the former, I think they use HTML color codes, which are six characters long alphanumeric strings, look for those; of the other, find the template box title and search for it wit hthe 'templates' category checked. Hope this helps, and if I understand yoru description, yeah, good change to make, thought the colors are, i suspect, menat to parallel the eclipse symbol of the show. ThuranX 22:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Heroes infoboxSince you're now one of the troops, perhaps you can help me with an issue similar to one we had in HP. If you look at, for example, Claire Bennet's infobox, you can see that it's being used to hold far too much information. In HP we eventualy cut it down to the bare essentials, but when I brought it up here, I didn't get a response. I'm not terribly esatblished within the community, so I didn't want to make such drastic edits without consensus, but two of us should hold some leverage. Thanks. asyndeton 10:55, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Arcayne, you went through and changed "portrayer" to "actor" for all the Heroes characters. However, the "Actor" category doesn't show up on the page. Ophois 04:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Another Happy Product of our educational system
Ann CoulterExcuse me? Did you inadvertently scoop me up among the half-dozen mischievous editors' comments you swept aside? Observing from the other side of the world from the USA in Australia, as I do, where Ms Coulter's commentary is observed from a disinterested distance on YouTube, such commentary as that of Ann Coulter has to be taken as humorous. (Dire and satiric, to be sure, but humorous all the same.) Is it in your view vandalism so to characterise it?! Masalai 08:12, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Ann Coulter vandalismPlease stop. You comments to the article of a BLP are not appropriate or appreciated. You are an experienced editor who knows what vandalism is, and what the penalty for vandalism is. Knock it off, or face the repercussions. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 06:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Anne Coulter and Supposed Flame MembersHi, it's I the noob Mortello. Anyway, being here is enjoying, but excuse the aggressive responses. Although I don't cause trouble, I have a tendency of defending those I advocate, agressively, and that in turn may come off a bit too much when I get worked up. Anyway, I think I may or may not have done it again with the supposed flames, but now that I got your message, I know what to do. This time, rather than attacking, I'll try to keep the arguement strictly about the arguement rather than the member themself. Still, if a member uses a famous qoute that helps describe the person with accuracy, would that be so wrong? Mortello 21:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC) Children of MenThe admin Alkivar has unilaterally removed non-free images from Children of Men and Fight Club (film) with no attempt at discussion. The non-free images had fair use rationales attached, and the admin just decided of his own accord that the rationales were not sufficient. I've brought up the issue at WikiProject Films and am considering filing an incident report regarding his conduct, which is reminiscent of a similar brusque admin at 300 (film). —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
HPHi, I only recently noticed that you reverted my edits to Harry Potter (character). I've left a comment on that article's talk page discussing my feelings, if could please take a look and reply. Thanks. Paul730 09:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC) heroes and powersIt's worth discussing, but ultimately, in the face of the current project through the project, minor. For now, until we shape up the articles and substantiate the characters via various interviews, I think it's minor. thanks for asking though, I posted a longer explanation at the talk page. ThuranX 03:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC) Die cruft die
|
||||||||
