Misplaced Pages

User talk:72.83.118.69: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:32, 27 October 2007 editGinkgo100 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,243 edits October 2007: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:45, 27 October 2007 edit undo72.83.118.69 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 47: Line 47:


Please stop restoring the abusive comment made at ]. If you continue to restore it, you may be '''blocked''' from editing. Thank you. --]<sup>]</sup> 01:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Please stop restoring the abusive comment made at ]. If you continue to restore it, you may be '''blocked''' from editing. Thank you. --]<sup>]</sup> 01:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Abusive... yeah, wtf. If you feel that my comment is abusive, then you might as well delete 90% of the other comments that were directed toward Bobsmith's crazy rant about removing the nude image. All I'm saying is that I find it funny that he is threating to report people when they reply to him about how he is forcing his beliefs on other people. The only reason you see my comment as "trolling" was because at the same time I first posted it, I decide to attack Bobsmith's profile. Its not trolling, it just a simple comment to Bobsmith. ] 15:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:45, 27 October 2007

August 2007

Bonnie Wright

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did to Bonnie Wright, you will be blocked from editing.

Repeated vandalism, personal attacks and abuse will not be tolerated. Aula 22:47, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Fred and George

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Fred and George Weasley. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Faithlessthewonderboy 04:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


Please do not erase the warnings and notices given to you on your talk page. Such action is also considered vandalism, and will most likely be reverted because the notices are there as a record. If, after some time goes by, you'd like to archive them, feel free to do so on a separate page. However, recent notices should remain on the page. Thanks! 17:15, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Bobsmith319, you will be blocked from editing. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 01:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Bobsmith319. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dreadstar 02:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Antandrus (talk) 02:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.83.118.69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I did not mess with Bobsmith319's page. My friend got on Misplaced Pages and I showed him the fight in the pregnancy's discussion page. While I was gone, he didn't to mess around with Bobsmith's page since he found his annoying. Anyway, please give me another chance... I don't wanna wait a week just to use Misplaced Pages again. Also what you mean with "Blocked again; I'm sure that's a huge surprise"

Decline reason:

Your friend's pretty nasty. Nasty enough to keep you off Misplaced Pages for a week. I'd be pretty angry at him if I were you. When you get back in a week, keep him away from your computer. — jpgordon 03:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alright, I'll take the week ban. Well sorry for the crap he caused. 72.83.118.69 03:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to User:Bobsmith319. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. To the person who's not doing this, you might consider creating an account, since this IP is likely to be blocked again quite soon. delldot talk 03:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hey delldot, that Bobsmith kid put up a banner a few days ago on my talk page saying I was banned from editing at Misplaced Pages indefinitely. I don't want that kid messing with my Discussion page.

OK, but please don't mess with his page either. delldot talk 04:02, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Weasley family, you will be blocked from editing. --Max Talk (+) 05:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I was about to undo it, but you beat me to it. I'll use the sandbox from now on. 72.83.118.69 05:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

All right, thank you.--Max Talk (+) 05:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Avro Tudor, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Avro Tudor was changed by 72.83.118.69 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-09-03T03:11:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 07:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

blocked again

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. jpgordon 15:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

72.83.118.69 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That is the biggest crap I've ever heard! First of all I only did some minor vandalism yesterday, but I stopped within minutes. The only way you could pin me for major vandalism is if you counted the stuff I did to the Sandbox. If you're going to block me atleast then don't do it for a month! That is just pure crap! Really it is.

Decline reason:

Actually, it appears that you were engaging in vandalism for a good hour. This isn't your first block and they escalate each time. Denied. — IrishGuy 23:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2007

Please stop restoring the abusive comment made at Talk:Pregnancy. If you continue to restore it, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --Ginkgo100 01:32, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Abusive... yeah, wtf. If you feel that my comment is abusive, then you might as well delete 90% of the other comments that were directed toward Bobsmith's crazy rant about removing the nude image. All I'm saying is that I find it funny that he is threating to report people when they reply to him about how he is forcing his beliefs on other people. The only reason you see my comment as "trolling" was because at the same time I first posted it, I decide to attack Bobsmith's profile. Its not trolling, it just a simple comment to Bobsmith. 72.83.118.69 15:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)