| Revision as of 00:17, 4 November 2007 editShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:HalfShadow/Archive 2← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:08, 5 November 2007 edit undoReyBrujo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,722 edits →Re: The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| {{smile|]}} | {{smile|]}} | ||
| == Re: The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding == | |||
| I prefer to block vandals attacking the featured articles than protecting it. That would give vandals only two chances of attack, the first one to get a {{tl|bv-n}} tag, the second to get blocked. Based on that, unless editors are attacking persons (libel information being added, contact information being included, etc), I think we can handle any article being open for editing (as you say, there are as many users watching it as those vandalizing it). -- ] 04:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:08, 5 November 2007
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 02 days are automatically archived to User talk:HalfShadow/Archive 2. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
George W. Bush talk page edit summary
Classic. You have my respect. 
Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 00:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Cookie
Per your request on my talk page. An admin aims to please. (Someone else will have to handle the chocolate milk, though.) User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward5b
Sheridan College
And according to this, which I only just found, it is the second largest. But, what the Hell is that even based on? I am so confused!!! http://www-acad.sheridanc.on.ca/BUSM25315/bruzzeda/indexj.htm
Sheridan College Followup
Ah, don't worry about it. Thanks, all the same!
Smile!
This template must be substituted, see Template:Smile for instructions
Re: The only time I've ever seen the featured get a protect is when it's taking an absolutely massive pounding
I prefer to block vandals attacking the featured articles than protecting it. That would give vandals only two chances of attack, the first one to get a {{bv-n}} tag, the second to get blocked. Based on that, unless editors are attacking persons (libel information being added, contact information being included, etc), I think we can handle any article being open for editing (as you say, there are as many users watching it as those vandalizing it). -- ReyBrujo 04:08, 5 November 2007 (UTC)