Revision as of 08:24, 13 December 2007 editBrendan (talk | contribs)1,523 edits Undid revision 177617739 by Timeshift9 (talk) Please refrain from trolling my talkpage; you've been asked not to before← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:43, 13 December 2007 edit undoShot info (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,052 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:Can you please clarify what you refer to as harrassment? If you are alleging, per your comments on the ANI page, that I "outed" someone, I would expect you to prove that and moreover be consistent in your enforcement by disciplining ] for falsely "outing" me on the ] as someone called 'Brendan Jones' (despite his "''"but I didn't really say it" games''", in your words). --''']''' <span style="font-size:80%">] ]</span> 07:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | :Can you please clarify what you refer to as harrassment? If you are alleging, per your comments on the ANI page, that I "outed" someone, I would expect you to prove that and moreover be consistent in your enforcement by disciplining ] for falsely "outing" me on the ] as someone called 'Brendan Jones' (despite his "''"but I didn't really say it" games''", in your words). --''']''' <span style="font-size:80%">] ]</span> 07:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
::''My'' explaination of what I ''was'' saying. ] is refering to this "Unless you are Brendan Jones, I have no need to retract anything. And if you are Brendan Jones, then I still have no need to retract anything." of mine. Note I was not saying he was or wasn't, instead I was responding to his demand "Please also retract your false allegation that I have wikistalked anyone." which he made in response to my "an newsgroup writer "Peter", another writer "Brendan" (who stalked the before mentioned "Peter")". | |||
::Hence the sequence of events are, I mention a "Brendan " who has stalked (not Wikistalked) Peter McKay (sp) in Aus.Politics. Editor ] then believes this is a reference to him. Which I then clarify to make it clear it wasn't...and irrelevant in any case. At no time do I ''call'' him Brendan Jones as it is obvious that he cannot wikistalk anybody (not being an editor). Brendan did strike out his comment out after I make my reply so I can only assume that he too recognised this - but choose to ] anyway. Now for the record, I don't care who our ] is in real life. I only wished him to remove his outing efforts. If an admin believes my comments are inappropriate at ANi or here, I am willing to refactor them to avoid any potential confusion. Editors should be judged on their edits here in Misplaced Pages, not who they are in real life. ] (]) 08:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{unblock|RE: ]; Harassment by me of another user(s) has been alleged over comments in which I myself sought to actually point out, and call into question, harrassment of ] by ] on the ] page. It has also been alleged that I "tried to out real-life identities" without convicing demonstration of how Misplaced Pages policy has been materially breached (given that at no point have I posted any private personal information of any kind) nor how I could possible "out" someone I do not even know and have never met. Should the block be upheld, it is entirely inconsistent with the treatment of complainant ] on the ANI page, who went on to strongly impute that I am someone called 'Brendan Jones', constituting an attempted, albeit erroneous, "outing" of my personal identity deserving of equivalent repudiation}} | {{unblock|RE: ]; Harassment by me of another user(s) has been alleged over comments in which I myself sought to actually point out, and call into question, harrassment of ] by ] on the ] page. It has also been alleged that I "tried to out real-life identities" without convicing demonstration of how Misplaced Pages policy has been materially breached (given that at no point have I posted any private personal information of any kind) nor how I could possible "out" someone I do not even know and have never met. Should the block be upheld, it is entirely inconsistent with the treatment of complainant ] on the ANI page, who went on to strongly impute that I am someone called 'Brendan Jones', constituting an attempted, albeit erroneous, "outing" of my personal identity deserving of equivalent repudiation}} |
Revision as of 08:43, 13 December 2007
⇒ Start a new Talk topic
Blocked
As per the ANI discussion of which you are aware, you have been blocked for 48 h for harassing other users. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Can you please clarify what you refer to as harrassment? If you are alleging, per your comments on the ANI page, that I "outed" someone, I would expect you to prove that and moreover be consistent in your enforcement by disciplining User:Shot info for falsely "outing" me on the ANI thread as someone called 'Brendan Jones' (despite his ""but I didn't really say it" games", in your words). --Brendan 07:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- My explaination of what I was saying. User:Brendan is refering to this "Unless you are Brendan Jones, I have no need to retract anything. And if you are Brendan Jones, then I still have no need to retract anything." of mine. Note I was not saying he was or wasn't, instead I was responding to his demand "Please also retract your false allegation that I have wikistalked anyone." which he made in response to my "an newsgroup writer "Peter", another writer "Brendan" (who stalked the before mentioned "Peter")".
- Hence the sequence of events are, I mention a "Brendan " who has stalked (not Wikistalked) Peter McKay (sp) in Aus.Politics. Editor User:Brendan then believes this is a reference to him. Which I then clarify to make it clear it wasn't...and irrelevant in any case. At no time do I call him Brendan Jones as it is obvious that he cannot wikistalk anybody (not being an editor). Brendan did strike out his comment out after I make my reply so I can only assume that he too recognised this - but choose to game on anyway. Now for the record, I don't care who our User:Brendan is in real life. I only wished him to remove his outing efforts. If an admin believes my comments are inappropriate at ANi or here, I am willing to refactor them to avoid any potential confusion. Editors should be judged on their edits here in Misplaced Pages, not who they are in real life. Shot info (talk) 08:43, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Brendan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
RE: Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Wikistalking; Harassment by me of another user(s) has been alleged over comments in which I myself sought to actually point out, and call into question, harrassment of User:Lester by User:Skyring on the Talk:John Howard page. It has also been alleged that I "tried to out real-life identities" without convicing demonstration of how Misplaced Pages policy has been materially breached (given that at no point have I posted any private personal information of any kind) nor how I could possible "out" someone I do not even know and have never met. Should the block be upheld, it is entirely inconsistent with the treatment of complainant User:Shot info on the ANI page, who went on to strongly impute that I am someone called 'Brendan Jones', constituting an attempted, albeit erroneous, "outing" of my personal identity deserving of equivalent repudiationNotes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=RE: ]; Harassment by me of another user(s) has been alleged over comments in which I myself sought to actually point out, and call into question, harrassment of ] by ] on the ] page. It has also been alleged that I "tried to out real-life identities" without convicing demonstration of how Misplaced Pages policy has been materially breached (given that at no point have I posted any private personal information of any kind) nor how I could possible "out" someone I do not even know and have never met. Should the block be upheld, it is entirely inconsistent with the treatment of complainant ] on the ANI page, who went on to strongly impute that I am someone called 'Brendan Jones', constituting an attempted, albeit erroneous, "outing" of my personal identity deserving of equivalent repudiation |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=RE: ]; Harassment by me of another user(s) has been alleged over comments in which I myself sought to actually point out, and call into question, harrassment of ] by ] on the ] page. It has also been alleged that I "tried to out real-life identities" without convicing demonstration of how Misplaced Pages policy has been materially breached (given that at no point have I posted any private personal information of any kind) nor how I could possible "out" someone I do not even know and have never met. Should the block be upheld, it is entirely inconsistent with the treatment of complainant ] on the ANI page, who went on to strongly impute that I am someone called 'Brendan Jones', constituting an attempted, albeit erroneous, "outing" of my personal identity deserving of equivalent repudiation |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=RE: ]; Harassment by me of another user(s) has been alleged over comments in which I myself sought to actually point out, and call into question, harrassment of ] by ] on the ] page. It has also been alleged that I "tried to out real-life identities" without convicing demonstration of how Misplaced Pages policy has been materially breached (given that at no point have I posted any private personal information of any kind) nor how I could possible "out" someone I do not even know and have never met. Should the block be upheld, it is entirely inconsistent with the treatment of complainant ] on the ANI page, who went on to strongly impute that I am someone called 'Brendan Jones', constituting an attempted, albeit erroneous, "outing" of my personal identity deserving of equivalent repudiation |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}