| Revision as of 17:19, 13 December 2007 editBobak (talk | contribs)Administrators29,224 edits →RE: Quesiton (Leonid Hurwicz) 2: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:23, 13 December 2007 edit undoSusanLesch (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,013 edits →RE: Quesiton (Leonid Hurwicz) 2: thanks, replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| Hi Susan, I apologize for completely forgetting to respond --I have a bad habit of not following up on discussion pages (or any pages) that aren't on my watchlist. I came back on Monday and sort of went back to my semi-zombie-like state ("the Mondays") at the office. Working at the Dome must've been interesting, especially since it has all the features to make it usable for different sports. I didn't know you graduated from the U, what area? As for the talk points today: I'm a little confused as what you mean regarding the George Lucas article, did I make a mistake? --if so please let me know and I'll work on fixing it. As for the Star Tribune article, other than adding the photo I haven't really paid much attention to it --its not on my watchlist (neither is Lucas), most of those are just things I've created or done substantial edits to. It seems like that Star Tribune article got caught in a lot of miscommunication, though ] seems to be getting a bit testy. I'll start a discussion on the NY Times talk page to help get actual consensus rather than two editors on two sides, which is unproductive. Sorry again for not replying to the previous discussion, its a bit embarrassing for me. --] (]) 17:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | Hi Susan, I apologize for completely forgetting to respond --I have a bad habit of not following up on discussion pages (or any pages) that aren't on my watchlist. I came back on Monday and sort of went back to my semi-zombie-like state ("the Mondays") at the office. Working at the Dome must've been interesting, especially since it has all the features to make it usable for different sports. I didn't know you graduated from the U, what area? As for the talk points today: I'm a little confused as what you mean regarding the George Lucas article, did I make a mistake? --if so please let me know and I'll work on fixing it. As for the Star Tribune article, other than adding the photo I haven't really paid much attention to it --its not on my watchlist (neither is Lucas), most of those are just things I've created or done substantial edits to. It seems like that Star Tribune article got caught in a lot of miscommunication, though ] seems to be getting a bit testy. I'll start a discussion on the NY Times talk page to help get actual consensus rather than two editors on two sides, which is unproductive. Sorry again for not replying to the previous discussion, its a bit embarrassing for me. --] (]) 17:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Hello, Bobak. Very glad to hear from you. You youngin's sometimes forget us old ladies. I haven't read your reply but I will when I have a second. Take care. I am going out for a cup of hot cocoa and a quart of milk to calm down from whatever the heck that was. -] (]) 17:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:23, 13 December 2007
| This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SusanLesch. |
_2.jpg)
Raccoon by Darkone
RE: Quesiton (Leonid Hurwicz) 2
Hi Susan, I apologize for completely forgetting to respond --I have a bad habit of not following up on discussion pages (or any pages) that aren't on my watchlist. I came back on Monday and sort of went back to my semi-zombie-like state ("the Mondays") at the office. Working at the Dome must've been interesting, especially since it has all the features to make it usable for different sports. I didn't know you graduated from the U, what area? As for the talk points today: I'm a little confused as what you mean regarding the George Lucas article, did I make a mistake? --if so please let me know and I'll work on fixing it. As for the Star Tribune article, other than adding the photo I haven't really paid much attention to it --its not on my watchlist (neither is Lucas), most of those are just things I've created or done substantial edits to. It seems like that Star Tribune article got caught in a lot of miscommunication, though User:Beaker342 seems to be getting a bit testy. I'll start a discussion on the NY Times talk page to help get actual consensus rather than two editors on two sides, which is unproductive. Sorry again for not replying to the previous discussion, its a bit embarrassing for me. --Bobak (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, Bobak. Very glad to hear from you. You youngin's sometimes forget us old ladies. I haven't read your reply but I will when I have a second. Take care. I am going out for a cup of hot cocoa and a quart of milk to calm down from whatever the heck that was. -Susanlesch (talk) 17:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)