Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 19:10, 17 December 2007

BEFORE YOU POST, READ THIS, IF YOU DO NOT FOLLOW THESE RULES, I WILL REMOVE IT.

Archives

Archive 1: May 14th, 2007 – July 9th, 2007 Archive 2: July 24th, 2007 - August 19th, 2007 Archive 3: August 20th, 2007 - September 17th, 2007 Archive 4: September 18th, 2007 - October 22nd, 2007 Archive 5: October 22nd, 2007 - November 26th, 2007

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

RFA

My nomination of, Adam, (CastAStone) is legit. Please see my comment in the RFA Discussion. -DavidJ710 (talk) 04:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention to RfA, I am sorry about the chaos my nomination costs. I guess, I'll stick with editing until I am not such a noob... Keep up the good work. -DavidJ710 (talk) 05:09, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Nburden's RFA

Thanks for the advice, and your consideration. I appreciate it, and hope to continue to have a positive impact on the encyclopedia. Nburden 08:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

User harassment

To continue the thread over here...despite the confusion that led to Bill's comment about your admin/non-admin status, I have to tell you that I was impressed with your patience back when dealing with TougHHead. You might want to think about becoming an admin yourself one of these days. It's a hard job, whatever you do will be criticized by someone, and you'll garner your own set of stalkers, but it's also a very necessary job, and we need good people to do it. AKRadecki 14:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Score

It is true I did score that high.And I don't have any respect. I wonder why? Hardcore Hak 15:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Hardcore Hak If you have respect please sign my Geust Book.

Relax, man..

I'm not the Charles Manson. I just think it's a cool name. Hope that helps.--THIS IS CHARLES MANSON 00:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: User:ClueBot III/Run

Indeed it was a test. Thank you for the note, but I did revert myself (). Cassie Puma (talk) 00:29, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

• I wasn't telling User:ClueBot to stop running, I was testing User:ClueBot III, an archival bot. ClueBot III hasn't made a single edit since over 2 hours ago, and I wanted to experiment and see if saying False would make a difference. Cassie Puma (talk) 00:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I understand spam. My question was why was TrueFocus considered spam?

I already apologized for inappropriately adding TrueFocus to focus stacking. That was due to ignorance not mischief. If two products are mentioned under the focus stacking section of depth of field, why can't TrueFocus be mentioned as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps they are notable products. Can you also recall what the article said? Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I can't really remember. It said something like it can take a picture without the delay that the normal autofocus cameras have. It also focuses all planes simultaneously. There's no need for moving parts. Stuff like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.84.35 (talk • contribs)

Sorry, but that sounds like advertising, something that displays all the functions in a product without an encyclopedic tone. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:38, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

It may be, but aren't those functions notable? Those types of comparisons are made between anything. Is it just because it's a product that makes it advertising? I'm sorry I don't have the best ability to write an encyclopedic tone, but can't someone else do that? I always here about people who only go around fixing grammar and stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You can go here and someone will create your article and fix it up. Just be sure to follow the instructions. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

So why was it considered advertising again? 75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Probably because it did not read like an encyclopedia entry, but rather something to encourage a buyer. I cannot see the article, unfortunatley. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

You aren't an administrator?75.66.84.35 (talk) 03:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Actually, no. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Casey dreier

There was an unsourced allegation that he exposed himself. That's why I warned for writing attack articles. —C.Fred (talk) 05:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Ryan serhant

Or, as you more correctly put it, Ryan Serhant. Thanks for moving this article; I suppose I've been on new page patrol for so long that it looks perfectly natural not to have a capital letter at the beginning of your last name. I also appreciate your having tagged it for notability, which nicely solved my dilemma about its prospective deletion; I felt there was just barely enough notability to keep it but it could sure use some bolstering, and this way some soap fan may provide some. My thanks for two helpful contributions. Accounting4Taste:talk 05:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

My pleasure -- give credit where credit is due, and it was due. I've left a note about the article on the talk page of the Soap Opera Task Force and hope they'll pick up the ball and run with it. Accounting4Taste:talk 05:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

User talk pages

Hi, JetLover. I noticed that you've warned at least one user about their edits. Upon them removing those warnings, you restored them and placed a template, I presume made by you, indicating that such actions are not within policy and should not be done. However, as read at WP:BLANKING, "Policy does not prohibit users from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user. Deleted warnings can still be found in the page history." Also check out WP:DRC. Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions. Regards, Lara❤Love 07:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I don't remember. I tried looking back through your contribs to find it, but didn't. The template has been edited to remove the comment about not blanking. If the vandalism continues after they blank their page, then you can restore the removed warnings while adding the next. Otherwise, assume good faith that they've read it and understand. The exemption is shared IPs. Warnings from those should not be blanked. Regards, Lara❤Love 01:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for letting me know! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 03:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Checkuser case completed

Hi, A checkuser IP Check case you filled has been completed by a CheckUser, and archived. You can find the results for 7 days at Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive. -- lucasbfr , checkuser clerk, 17:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC).

User talk:Noway419

Done (after a couple of tries to find a good revision). I also declined the unblock request and protected the page. I was initially going to leave the request for someone else to review, but, the next time I checked my watchlist, the situation was quickly deteriorating, and it was nigh time to nip it in the bud. — TKD::Talk 04:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Should be fixed now. — TKD::Talk 04:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

No problem. Apologies for taking a couple of tries to get it right; I think that my daily caffeine dose is wearing off. :) — TKD::Talk 04:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Deleting my message to another user

Why did you delete my message to another user? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Ahh... thanks! --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. Thanks, and happy editing! Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:22, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Sultan Uddin

Sultan Uddin doesn't meet speedy deletion criteria under G7, which you tagged it for. If you check the history, you'll see that other users have made substantial contributions to the page (e.g., cleanup), making the page not meet that particular criterion. Please check the page history before making G7 taggings in future. Spebi 00:19, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

No, it's not okay, because it only applies if "the page's only substantial content was added by its author", and by judging the page history, he wasn't the only user to make substantial changes. Therefore the tag is invalid. If the author could request deletion without the "other substantial changes from other users" rule, authors could be tagging United States, Misplaced Pages, even Main Page for deletion. Spebi 00:29, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I nominated it for deletion: see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sultan Uddin. Thanks. Redrocketboy 00:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Codelyoko193

What do you think we should do to get Angie to listen? Time and time again, she continues this behavior as if she was never talked to. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Angie Y.

Jet, Angie made another POV edit. Placing the word finally in the context it was means that she is on a side of the character, and not being neutral. Do you think it is time for WP:ANI, or do you think this was too little? Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 22:41, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

If I were to make an RfC, would you co it with me? Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 00:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)\

Hm... we could do it now. It may take a while, because we have to find all the links... Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 00:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I was doing it, but it would've taken me a while. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

You shouldn't apologize for making the RfC. She deserved it. Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 01:31, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which was successful with a vote of 33/7/4.

I am honoured by the trust placed in me by the community. I hope to repay this by the wise use of the tools, which I intend to use gradually. Mop & bucket is on the Christmas list - honest. Keith D (talk) 00:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Neville neville

An article that you have been involved in editing, Neville neville, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/. Thank you. I realize you haven't been directly involved, but have tagged one of the many sibling pages that popped up in the past two days Toddst1 (talk) 01:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Appreciate the reversions. I wish vandals would learn to spell "spatula'> Acroterion _(talk) 04:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays from Marlith /C

Credits: This card was inspired by Macy's123, assistant of V's Shop

Marlith /C 00:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Christmas Card

Happy New Year! -- Chetblong_Sign