Misplaced Pages

Talk:Carl Hewitt: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:36, 18 December 2007 editSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 editsm Unprotected Talk:Carl Hewitt: as discussed on WT:BLP← Previous edit Revision as of 21:43, 18 December 2007 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits suggestionNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:
:The consensus there is clearly that this should not be protected. As a fellow admin, I therefore ask SV to remove the protection. ''']''' (]) 18:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC) :The consensus there is clearly that this should not be protected. As a fellow admin, I therefore ask SV to remove the protection. ''']''' (]) 18:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
::I've replied on ]. <font color="Purple">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 19:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC) ::I've replied on ]. <font color="Purple">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 19:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

==Suggestion==
Following a suggestion from Black Falcon, I've unprotected the page to allow people to discuss the Observer article for a few days, as some editors seem to feel that discussion is required. The suggestion is that the discussion will be blanked after a few days as a courtesy. I was thinking three days, although no one's going to blank it mid-sentence so if it takes a bit longer, that's fine. But the idea is to discuss it, wrap it up, then blank the discussion. I hope the editors here see that as a fair compromise. <font color="Purple">]</font> <small><sup><font color="Blue">]</font><font color="Green">]</font></sup></small> 21:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:43, 18 December 2007

WikiProject iconBiography: Science and Academia Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
Note icon
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.
The following Misplaced Pages contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Page protection

I've archived and protected this talk page because people were adding problematic material. As the article is currently protected from editing, there's no need for this to be open at the moment anyway. If anyone has a query, by all means e-mail me. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 17:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Aactually, as it is protected from editing at the moment the talk page does need to be open for protected edit requests. Viridae 21:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
If anyone has such a request, they can e-mail me or another admin. I'd like to keep it protected for a short time, Viridae. SlimVirgin 23:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Yeah understandable. I am also open to making small, uncontroversial edits for people, they can request them on my talk page while this page is protected. Viridae 00:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
I do not believe it is appropriate to protect an article talk page, and definitely not because of something like this. Comments? Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 05:02, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
See Wikipedia_talk:Biographies_of_living_persons#Removing_discussion_of_articles_in_major_newspapers_from_talk_pages. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 06:00, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
The consensus there is clearly that this should not be protected. As a fellow admin, I therefore ask SV to remove the protection. DGG (talk) 18:08, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
I've replied on WT:BLP. SlimVirgin 19:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion

Following a suggestion from Black Falcon, I've unprotected the page to allow people to discuss the Observer article for a few days, as some editors seem to feel that discussion is required. The suggestion is that the discussion will be blanked after a few days as a courtesy. I was thinking three days, although no one's going to blank it mid-sentence so if it takes a bit longer, that's fine. But the idea is to discuss it, wrap it up, then blank the discussion. I hope the editors here see that as a fair compromise. SlimVirgin 21:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Categories: