Revision as of 03:36, 10 January 2008 editCambridgeBayWeather (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators253,316 edits Closing keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:11, 10 January 2008 edit undoGazzster (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,329 edits →Jean ChretienNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
*'''Keep''' - Am I missing something here. The prime minister of one of the greatest nations in the world doesn't deserve an article because he is 'relatively little known'? Well, then, better delete ], ], ] and ].--] (]) 04:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:11, 10 January 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY KEEP. Don't know if its the redirect or the main article but neither one will be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 03:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Jean Chretien
AfDs for this article:- Jean Chretien (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non noted individual. Unresonable to have a page in wikipedia due to being relatively little known Winniethepooh1989 03:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Oh, time-wasting joke nomination. Really, we do have better things to do, Winnie. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Technically this is an AFD for a redirect page, of course. :O) But a valid redirect. And still time-wasting FlowerpotmaN·(t) 03:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- Keep - Am I missing something here. The prime minister of one of the greatest nations in the world doesn't deserve an article because he is 'relatively little known'? Well, then, better delete Harold Holt, Andrew Johnson, Joanna the Mad and Pius VIII.--Gazzster (talk) 04:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)