Misplaced Pages

User talk:Black Kite/Archive09: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Black Kite Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:05, 17 January 2008 editPixelface (talk | contribs)12,801 edits new section: Involved parties← Previous edit Revision as of 15:30, 17 January 2008 edit undoPixelface (talk | contribs)12,801 edits new section: Request for ArbitrationNext edit →
Line 44: Line 44:
==Involved parties== ==Involved parties==
], you {{diff|page=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration|diff=prev|oldid=184876621|label=said}} "Earlier today, User:Tim Q. Wells unilaterally reverted every single Scrubs episode article so that they are now individual articles. I have thus added his name to this RFAR as an involved party." I seriously don't think you know what the word "unilaterally" means ''or'' what ] means. There is no consensus for the ''Scrubs'' episode articles to be redirects on ]. To say that he "unilaterally" reverted every single ''Scrubs'' episode article is ridiculous. Feel free to add yourself to the arbitration case as well, because you {{diff|page=User_talk:Pixelface|diff=prev|oldid=184132994|label=threatened}} to block me and later ] me by {{diff|page=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents|diff=prev|oldid=184133287|label=accusing}} me of stalking. You can add yourself as an involved party to the ] or I'll add your name for you. Thanks. --] (]) 15:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC) ], you {{diff|page=Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration|diff=prev|oldid=184876621|label=said}} "Earlier today, User:Tim Q. Wells unilaterally reverted every single Scrubs episode article so that they are now individual articles. I have thus added his name to this RFAR as an involved party." I seriously don't think you know what the word "unilaterally" means ''or'' what ] means. There is no consensus for the ''Scrubs'' episode articles to be redirects on ]. To say that he "unilaterally" reverted every single ''Scrubs'' episode article is ridiculous. Feel free to add yourself to the arbitration case as well, because you {{diff|page=User_talk:Pixelface|diff=prev|oldid=184132994|label=threatened}} to block me and later ] me by {{diff|page=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents|diff=prev|oldid=184133287|label=accusing}} me of stalking. You can add yourself as an involved party to the ] or I'll add your name for you. Thanks. --] (]) 15:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

==Request for Arbitration==
You have been named as an involved party in a request for arbitration. Please see ]. Thank you. --] (]) 15:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:30, 17 January 2008

User:Black Kite/Menu

Talk Page archives: 01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08
To leave me a message, click here

re: TuneDNA

Thanks for the tip! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickrjk (talk • contribs) 18:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

anon IPs editwarring

he has reverted you and here.--Padraig (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Have to say I prefer your stubbed version of the wording.--Padraig (talk) 15:37, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Waterboarding/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny 16:38, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Email

Sent one on the Pixelface issue. Kinda mooted though. Will 23:59, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

The Troubles

Bear in mind that the case itself was the warning for those users listed as parties; both Padraig and Traditional unionist were parties so, per the terms of the remedy, there's no need for any final warnings for them before they are put on revert probation. --bainer (talk) 15:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Centralized TV Episode Discussion

Over the past months, TV episodes have been reverted by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . --Maniwar (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR 09:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Involved parties

Black Kite, you said "Earlier today, User:Tim Q. Wells unilaterally reverted every single Scrubs episode article so that they are now individual articles. I have thus added his name to this RFAR as an involved party." I seriously don't think you know what the word "unilaterally" means or what consensus means. There is no consensus for the Scrubs episode articles to be redirects on Talk:List of Scrubs episodes. To say that he "unilaterally" reverted every single Scrubs episode article is ridiculous. Feel free to add yourself to the arbitration case as well, because you threatened to block me and later personally attacked me by accusing me of stalking. You can add yourself as an involved party to the request for arbitration or I'll add your name for you. Thanks. --Pixelface (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Request for Arbitration

You have been named as an involved party in a request for arbitration. Please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#The Television Episodes Edit Wars. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 15:30, 17 January 2008 (UTC)