Revision as of 01:23, 18 November 2003 editJmabel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators90,310 edits Just removing a message from another user to me.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:14, 3 December 2003 edit undoHashar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,602 editsm answering about ro: from my talk:Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I notice that your robot change to ] broke the link to the Romanian-language article. Is this preparatory to a change on the Romanian-language site, or is this a screw-up? If the latter, I'm guessing the robot did the same to other pages, too. -- ] 20:42, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC) | |||
Hello Jmabel. | |||
The robot followed the old link <nowiki>]</nowiki> and noticed that the page on ro is a redirect to . So the robot changed the en: article so a user is not pointed to the redirect page but directly to the redirected page. | |||
The actual link is <nowiki>]</nowiki> and output as <nowiki>http://ro.wikipedia.org/Bucure%C5%9Fti</nowiki> in html. This link should be correctly interpreted by your browser. | |||
cheers, | |||
Please answer on: | |||
] 21:14, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:14, 3 December 2003
I notice that your robot change to Bucharest broke the link to the Romanian-language article. Is this preparatory to a change on the Romanian-language site, or is this a screw-up? If the latter, I'm guessing the robot did the same to other pages, too. -- Jmabel 20:42, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)
Hello Jmabel.
The robot followed the old link ] and noticed that the page on ro is a redirect to Bucureşti. So the robot changed the en: article so a user is not pointed to the redirect page but directly to the redirected page. The actual link is ] and output as http://ro.wikipedia.org/Bucure%C5%9Fti in html. This link should be correctly interpreted by your browser.
cheers,
Please answer on: my talk page
Hashar 21:14, 3 Dec 2003 (UTC)