| Revision as of 11:56, 1 February 2008 editLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 edits →civility (2nd): please avoid edit warring← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:32, 5 February 2008 edit undoLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 edits →civility (2nd): replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Andrew, a look at ] shows singular dedication to the ] subject. I'm sure that your efforts will be more readily accepted once you have a bit more experience -- and ''choose'' to follow the accepted discussion guidelines. (keep your comments '''short!'''). Please try your hand contributing to a different article for experience, and re-read ]. '''∴''' ]…] 08:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | Andrew, a look at ] shows singular dedication to the ] subject. I'm sure that your efforts will be more readily accepted once you have a bit more experience -- and ''choose'' to follow the accepted discussion guidelines. (keep your comments '''short!'''). Please try your hand contributing to a different article for experience, and re-read ]. '''∴''' ]…] 08:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Please stop edit warring over this article; I am well aware that you're not technically breaching ], but you are nevertheless attempting to ] a page and are ] any changes out via brute force. I'm phrasing this as a polite request, but I should clarify that I am acting as an administrator in this context, and I am prepared to protect pages and block editors as needed to calm this situation down. Please make appropriate use of the ] process -- if your preferred version is truly superior, feel free to build ] that it is so; brute force does not demonstrate or override consensus. Thank you for your time and effort. – <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 11:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | :Please stop edit warring over this article; I am well aware that you're not technically breaching ], but you are nevertheless attempting to ] a page and are ] any changes out via brute force. I'm phrasing this as a polite request, but I should clarify that I am acting as an administrator in this context, and I am prepared to protect pages and block editors as needed to calm this situation down. Please make appropriate use of the ] process -- if your preferred version is truly superior, feel free to build ] that it is so; brute force does not demonstrate or override consensus. Thank you for your time and effort. – <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 11:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::If anyone's sunk more reverts into the page than you, feel free to point them out and I'll leave them a similar note. It's true that you're not the ''only'' person reverting, but from a glance it looks like the bulk of reverts are coming from you; if you can provide some evidence to the contrary, I'll be happy to review it. I'm enforcing ] here, and that's pretty much it -- Misplaced Pages's reputation also relies on our ability to work out disputes via some mechanism more diplomatic than "those who shout loudest and longest win." – <span style="font-family: Garamond">] (])</span> 21:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 5 February 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Andrew81446, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Seraphim 01:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
talk page guidelines
Hey andrew, thanks for your contribs to Hacker. I noticed you reacted defensively when another editor suggested you keep comments short on talk pages at Talk:Hacker, but I would also request the same -- and based on widely accepted guidelines for talk pages. Check out wikipedia:talk_page_guidelines , specifically: Misplaced Pages:Talk_page_guidelines#Good_practice , which states, Be concise: If your post is longer than 100 words, consider shortening it. Long, rambling messages are difficult to understand, and are frequently either ignored or misunderstood.. For the sake of all those interested in following the discussions behind the articles, try to keep comments short! The rest of the talk page guidelines as well as Misplaced Pages:Civility are well worth the read if you plan to stick around. We're all on the same team here... believe it. Feel free to drop any questions my way, and again -- welcome. ∴ here…♠ 03:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I wrote simply to welcome and confirm that you'd seen the talk page guidelines. Thanks also for the policy links, it is good to see that you've read through those pages as well. Best of luck sticking around... Feel free to drop any questions my way! ∴ here…♠ 19:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
civility (2nd)
Andrew, a look at your contributions shows singular dedication to the Hacker subject. I'm sure that your efforts will be more readily accepted once you have a bit more experience -- and choose to follow the accepted discussion guidelines. (keep your comments short!). Please try your hand contributing to a different article for experience, and re-read Misplaced Pages:Civility. ∴ here…♠ 08:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Please stop edit warring over this article; I am well aware that you're not technically breaching WP:3RR, but you are nevertheless attempting to own a page and are edit warring any changes out via brute force. I'm phrasing this as a polite request, but I should clarify that I am acting as an administrator in this context, and I am prepared to protect pages and block editors as needed to calm this situation down. Please make appropriate use of the dispute resolution process -- if your preferred version is truly superior, feel free to build consensus that it is so; brute force does not demonstrate or override consensus. Thank you for your time and effort. – Luna Santin (talk) 11:56, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- If anyone's sunk more reverts into the page than you, feel free to point them out and I'll leave them a similar note. It's true that you're not the only person reverting, but from a glance it looks like the bulk of reverts are coming from you; if you can provide some evidence to the contrary, I'll be happy to review it. I'm enforcing WP:EW here, and that's pretty much it -- Misplaced Pages's reputation also relies on our ability to work out disputes via some mechanism more diplomatic than "those who shout loudest and longest win." – Luna Santin (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)