| Revision as of 02:58, 6 February 2008 view sourceRiana (talk | contribs)36,950 edits →Blocked: declined unblock← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:31, 6 February 2008 view source Charles Stewart (talk | contribs)340 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=shaving a few hours off my block won't hurt anyone. I'm sorry for what I did, and I promise not to do it again, and only to help this fine project|decline=There's absolutely no assurance of that. Be glad you weren't blocked indefinitely. ~ ] 02:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=shaving a few hours off my block won't hurt anyone. I'm sorry for what I did, and I promise not to do it again, and only to help this fine project|decline=There's absolutely no assurance of that. Be glad you weren't blocked indefinitely. ~ ] 02:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| {{Unblock|My block expired two hours ago, but I can't edit yet}} | |||
Revision as of 14:31, 6 February 2008
You've reached the talk page of Charles Stewart, please leave your message at the beep:
Welcome!
Hello, Charles Stewart, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
TheA Daily Show
What do the credits say Gnevin (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know, but they would probably name the writers. Eitherway, the sentence I removed made zero sense. Charles Stewart (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- It makes prefect sense as it's unclear who is writing this show , please continue this on the article talk page Gnevin (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Its safe to say that Stewart his writing his own stuff , . Charles Stewart (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Still not clear but better Gnevin (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- Its safe to say that Stewart his writing his own stuff , . Charles Stewart (talk) 17:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
- It makes prefect sense as it's unclear who is writing this show , please continue this on the article talk page Gnevin (talk) 16:59, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
You've been blocked for two days for your page move stunt. --Bongwarrior (talk) 12:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Charles Stewart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Its been nine hours, and I feel I've learned my lesson. I just want to do good for this site.
Decline reason:
That's unconvincing. Learned how? What does "do good" mean? Persuade us by not disrupting this site after the block expires. — Sandstein (talk) 21:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ok Charles Stewart (talk) 21:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Charles Stewart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
shaving a few hours off my block won't hurt anyone. I'm sorry for what I did, and I promise not to do it again, and only to help this fine project
Decline reason:
There's absolutely no assurance of that. Be glad you weren't blocked indefinitely. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Charles Stewart (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
My block expired two hours ago, but I can't edit yetNotes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=My block expired two hours ago, but I can't edit yet |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=My block expired two hours ago, but I can't edit yet |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=My block expired two hours ago, but I can't edit yet |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}