Misplaced Pages

Talk:Light pollution/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Light pollution Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:05, 17 July 2005 editIzogi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,280 edits radio spectrum pollution← Previous edit Revision as of 05:45, 18 July 2005 edit undoIzogi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,280 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
** <s>Should the paragraph about Calgary be moved to this section?</s> ''Done. ] 03:19, 11 July 2005 (UTC)'' ** <s>Should the paragraph about Calgary be moved to this section?</s> ''Done. ] 03:19, 11 July 2005 (UTC)''
* Maybe think about adding a section to do with the current state of light pollution around the world. (Don't know how this would work, but the text about Utah having the least LP in the US doesn't seem to fit well in the ''Consequences of light pollution'' section.) Thoughts? ] 8 July 2005 07:01 (UTC) * Maybe think about adding a section to do with the current state of light pollution around the world. (Don't know how this would work, but the text about Utah having the least LP in the US doesn't seem to fit well in the ''Consequences of light pollution'' section.) Thoughts? ] 8 July 2005 07:01 (UTC)
* Note something about pollution of the radio spectrum. (This may actually warrant its own article, but it should at least be cited here.) ] * <s>Note something about pollution of the radio spectrum. (This may actually warrant its own article, but it should at least be cited here.) ]</s> ''Added a disambiguation page and (for now) linked it to a ] stub. ] 05:45, 18 July 2005 (UTC)''

Revision as of 05:45, 18 July 2005

  • Check that references are formatted properly, both in the references list and in the article.
  • Expand the table of luminaires in the Adjusting types of lighting section.
    • This list is based on data in the IDA Information Sheet 52, which still needs to be cited.
  • Expand the Organisations section so that it explains a bit about the formation of various organisations, instead of just listing a couple.
    • It might be useful to include a lighting engineering organisation or two, if there are any prominent ones.
    • Are there any well known organisations that actively counter what anti-LP campaigners say? If so, it's probably worth mentioning them to maintain a neutral point of view.
  • Add a more specific citation for the information in Interruption of the eco-system which refers to Michael Mesure's comments about the deaths of millions of birds. (Although I don't doubt he's said it, I couldn't find a reference, myself -- Izogi) Well tidied up by a helpful anonymous user—Thanks heaps. Izogi 10:23, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Some of the text in the Types of light pollution section might actually belong in the Consequences of light pollution section, or maybe not.
  • Consider expanding the section about Redesigning lighting plans, or perhaps merge it into other sections. It seems a bit short right now. Done. Izogi 03:19, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Maybe think about adding a section to do with the current state of light pollution around the world. (Don't know how this would work, but the text about Utah having the least LP in the US doesn't seem to fit well in the Consequences of light pollution section.) Thoughts? Izogi 8 July 2005 07:01 (UTC)
  • Note something about pollution of the radio spectrum. (This may actually warrant its own article, but it should at least be cited here.) Izogi Added a disambiguation page and (for now) linked it to a radio spectrum pollution stub. Izogi 05:45, 18 July 2005 (UTC)