Misplaced Pages

Ebionites: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:30, 10 December 2003 edit24.202.135.211 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:12, 10 December 2003 edit undo142.205.240.212 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Ebionites''' (perhaps from ] א&#1489יונים, '''Ebionim''', "the poor ones") were a Messianic Jewish sect which existed in the Near East during the early centuries of the ]. The '''Ebionites''' (from ] א&#1489יונים, '''Ebionim''', "the poor ones") were a Messianic Jewish sect which existed in the Near East during the early centuries of the ].


Virtually no writings of the Ebionites have survived, except as excerpted in the writings of orthodox Christians, such as ], ], and ], who considered the Ebionites to be heretics. Virtually no writings of the Ebionites have survived, except as excerpted in the writings of orthodox Christians, such as ], ], and ], who considered the Ebionites to be heretics.

Revision as of 21:12, 10 December 2003

The Ebionites (from Hebrew א&#1489יונים, Ebionim, "the poor ones") were a Messianic Jewish sect which existed in the Near East during the early centuries of the Common Era.

Virtually no writings of the Ebionites have survived, except as excerpted in the writings of orthodox Christians, such as Irenaeus, Hippolytus, and Tertullian, who considered the Ebionites to be heretics.

All these sources agree that the Ebionites denied the divinity of Jesus and the doctrine of the Trinity. One group, apparently the larger, denied the Virgin Birth as well, while a smaller group accepted this doctrine.

Both groups considered Paul to be an apostate, and of the books of the New Testament they accepted only a version of the Gospel of Matthew to be Scripture. Both groups also adhered to the Jewish religious law. Apparently, one group considered observance of the law mandatory for all followers of Jesus, while the other considered it to apply only to Messianic Jews. They revered James the Just as true successor of Jesus rather than Peter.

Neither group exerted any great influence, and both gradually dwindled into obscurity and extinction.

A later form of Ebionism was Gnostic in its teachings. Whether it was truly an historical development of earlier Ebionism, or simply shared the name, is not clear.