Misplaced Pages

Talk:East Timor: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:57, 3 September 2002 editEclecticology (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,056 edits arms trade sources← Previous edit Revision as of 10:07, 3 September 2002 edit undoEd Poor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,217 edits to Zoe and friendNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/sept99/14_45_070.html http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/sept99/14_45_070.html
] 09:57 Sep 3, 2002 (PDT) ] 09:57 Sep 3, 2002 (PDT)
----
''From the article:''
#Throughout the period 1975-1995 more than a billion dollars worth of American weapons were sold to Indonesia.
#In addition, 80 million dollars of free equipment was provided between 1975 and 1982.
#The sale of arms to any country intending to use them for aggressive purposes is illegal under American law.
It would help the article if someone could document any of the above points. I'd particularly like to see a definition of the word "aggressive" in the 3rd point.

Also, in general it's more helpful (and less provocative) to attribute claims to their proponents, as in ''The People's Movement for a Free and Independent East Timor said that...'' or whatever the case may be. Then it doesn't matter so much what the US '''really''' did: the article is only reporting what the PMFIET '''said''' they did. --]

Revision as of 10:07, 3 September 2002

Will the page be replaced when East Timor has an entry in the CIA World Factbook?

When discussing the event in East Timor (and probably many other places) you can't ignore the effects and influence of the arms trade on the development of those events. The following are just a few of the available sources. http://www.motherjones.com/arms/indonesia.html http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/indoarms.html http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/indo101001.htm#weapons2 http://www.wagingpeace.org/articles/armstradecodeofconduct.htm

For British involvement http://www.oneworld.org/ips2/sept99/14_45_070.html Eclecticology 09:57 Sep 3, 2002 (PDT)


From the article:

  1. Throughout the period 1975-1995 more than a billion dollars worth of American weapons were sold to Indonesia.
  2. In addition, 80 million dollars of free equipment was provided between 1975 and 1982.
  3. The sale of arms to any country intending to use them for aggressive purposes is illegal under American law.

It would help the article if someone could document any of the above points. I'd particularly like to see a definition of the word "aggressive" in the 3rd point.

Also, in general it's more helpful (and less provocative) to attribute claims to their proponents, as in The People's Movement for a Free and Independent East Timor said that... or whatever the case may be. Then it doesn't matter so much what the US really did: the article is only reporting what the PMFIET said they did. --Ed Poor