| Revision as of 14:31, 3 September 2002 editJeronimo (talk | contribs)8,556 edits re: April← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:33, 3 September 2002 edit undo-- April (talk | contribs)3,263 editsm Yes but...Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| : Given the fact that most of the inbound links are meant from the country (judging by the titles of the articles), I'd say there should be a block-format disambiguation at the top, with a link to ] which lists the other meanings (actually only the bird, the others are merely dictionary entries which do not make an article). ] | : Given the fact that most of the inbound links are meant from the country (judging by the titles of the articles), I'd say there should be a block-format disambiguation at the top, with a link to ] which lists the other meanings (actually only the bird, the others are merely dictionary entries which do not make an article). ] | ||
| * Yes, but sooner or later the taxonomists will be by, wanting to put in the classification of and picture for the turkey-bird. There ain't room enough in one article for the both of 'em! :) ] | |||
Revision as of 14:33, 3 September 2002
I think we should spin off Turkey (country) from the other meanings, at least once it becomes time to update this information in accord with the WikiProject Countries. -- April 14:14 Sep 3, 2002 (PDT)
- Given the fact that most of the inbound links are meant from the country (judging by the titles of the articles), I'd say there should be a block-format disambiguation at the top, with a link to Turkey (disambiguation) which lists the other meanings (actually only the bird, the others are merely dictionary entries which do not make an article). Jeronimo
- Yes, but sooner or later the taxonomists will be by, wanting to put in the classification of and picture for the turkey-bird. There ain't room enough in one article for the both of 'em! :) -- April