| Revision as of 17:01, 22 February 2008 edit74.163.223.240 (talk) →NEW NOMINATIONS← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:01, 22 February 2008 edit undo74.163.223.240 (talk) →Category:Visitor attractions in Bay Lake, FloridaNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| :'''Nominator's rationale:''' Too narrowly defined; only will contain venues at Walt Disney World Resort. Exists due to creator's edit-warring over categorizing Orlando-area attractions. ] (]) 10:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | :'''Nominator's rationale:''' Too narrowly defined; only will contain venues at Walt Disney World Resort. Exists due to creator's edit-warring over categorizing Orlando-area attractions. ] (]) 10:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::'''Delete and restore original "Orlando" category.''' and ] ] (]) 12:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | ::'''Delete and restore original "Orlando" category.''' and ] ] (]) 12:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::KEEP - this perfectly coincides with other categories of specific cities in Florida | |||
| ==== Category:Amusement parks in Bay Lake, Florida ==== | ==== Category:Amusement parks in Bay Lake, Florida ==== | ||
Revision as of 17:01, 22 February 2008
| < February 21 | February 23 > |
|---|
February 22
NEW NOMINATIONS
KEEP - this perfectly coincides with other categories of specific cities in Florida
Category:Video game failures
- Propose renaming Category:Video game failures to Category:Video game commercial failures
- Nominator's rationale: Rename. Current naming violates WP:NPOV. Another man's failure is another man's success. A video game that fails commercially can still have a very successful reception. MrStalker 14:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Category:Visitor attractions in Bay Lake, Florida
- Category:Visitor attractions in Bay Lake, Florida - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Too narrowly defined; only will contain venues at Walt Disney World Resort. Exists due to creator's edit-warring over categorizing Orlando-area attractions. See also Whoville (talk) 10:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and restore original "Orlando" category. also and Talk:Disney's_Hollywood_Studios#Orlando_attractions_vs_Florida_attractions SpikeJones (talk) 12:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- KEEP - this perfectly coincides with other categories of specific cities in Florida
Category:Amusement parks in Bay Lake, Florida
- Category:Amusement parks in Bay Lake, Florida - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Too narrowly defined; it only will contain the theme parks of Walt Disney World Resort and was born as the result of the creator's edit-warring over categorizing Orlando-area attractions Whoville (talk) 10:41, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and restore original "Orlando" category. see also and Talk:Disney's_Hollywood_Studios#Orlando_attractions_vs_Florida_attractions SpikeJones SpikeJones (talk) 12:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Category:Pyramid (TV game show series)
- Category:Pyramid (TV game show series) - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Redundant category, consists only of a page and two subpages, with little hope for expansion beyond that. Nothing would be lost if this category were deleted. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 05:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment no opinion really but at the very least, you should be aware that if the category is deleted then Pyramid (game show) broadcast history and Pyramid game and tournament play will become uncategorized articles. This needs to be fixed before deletion. Pichpich (talk) 06:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Category:Women writers by century
- Suggest merging Category:Women writers by century to Category:Women writers by time period
- Suggest merging Category:Women writers by historical period to Category:Women writers by time period
- Nominator's rationale: Merge/Rename, Consistent with Category:Writers by time period. Both categories are mainly intended as holders of subcategories and since neither has too many subcats, merging them is simply more convenient. Note also that there's no loss of information by doing this merge. Pichpich (talk) 02:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment What a mess! Category:Women writers by century is a sub-cat of Category:People by century too. Presumably it should be merged there as well. What are the time periods going to be, when these are merged? You will need a very literate bot to work out whether to put C19 women in "early modern" or "modern" etc, or vice versa. Johnbod (talk) 03:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I guess the same reasoning would go for any Category:Foo occupation by century. After all a century is a pretty well-defined period so having separate categories for Category:Foo occupation by century and Category:Foo occupation by period just makes it very hard for people browsing categories to find what they're looking for. Keeping Category:People by century is not a problem so long as we keep it only as a holder for the subcats Category:xxth century people and not for things like Category:Foo occupation by century. Pichpich (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete both as overcategorization by sex. Otto4711 (talk) 07:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Category:Libertarian businesspeople
- Category:Libertarian businesspeople - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Trivial intersection; makes no mention of how politics and business are related. Irk Come in for a drink! 00:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete agree with nominator. There's no serious evidence that businesspeople who are libertarians act in similar ways, nor is there any evidence that libertarians who happen to be businesspeople share specific beliefs related to business or form a distinct political subgroup among libertarians. Pichpich (talk) 03:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)