Misplaced Pages

User talk:Kahmed: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:27, 3 March 2008 editMastCell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators43,155 edits Edit-warring, Arbitration Commitee findings, etc.: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 00:12, 4 March 2008 edit undoKahmed (talk | contribs)64 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== ] == == ] ==
I would suggest you discuss your view on ]. However, I will remind you (and make sure it is absolutely clear) that you need to follow ] and do not in any disparage other editors. Warning templates and edit warring is not helpful. -- ] (]) 20:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC) I would suggest you discuss your view on ]. However, I will remind you (and make sure it is absolutely clear) that you need to follow ] and do not in any disparage other editors. Warning templates and edit warring is not helpful. -- ] (]) 20:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

== Edit-warring, Arbitration Commitee findings, etc. ==

You appear to be engaged in an ] on the article ]. Please note that edit-warring is strongly discouraged; making more than 3 reverts in a 24-hour period will lead to a block under the ], although ''any'' amount of edit-warring is harmful and blocks may result from fewer than 3 reverts. Please don't revert the article further: use the article talk page to discuss the disputed content, and consider the steps outlined in ] if you're unable to reach consensus.

Additionally, please note that articles relating to Israeli-Arab issues may be subject to specific sanctions under the ] recent decision found ]. This is a formal warning that the tolerance for edit-warring or other unconstructive behavior on these articles is especially low given a long history of problematic conduct on these articles. Practically, this means that you should make an extra effort to ] and ], ], and avoid ] and ]. If in doubt, it's best to seek outside input via the steps outlined in ]. ''']'''&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 23:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:12, 4 March 2008

Council on American-Islamic Relations

I would suggest you discuss your view on the talk page. However, I will remind you (and make sure it is absolutely clear) that you need to follow WP:CIVIL and do not in any disparage other editors. Warning templates and edit warring is not helpful. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)