| Revision as of 19:46, 7 March 2008 editArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,267 edits delete a bunch of threads for the duration of unblock discussion, for readability purposes← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:50, 7 March 2008 edit undoArcticocean (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users46,267 edits alterNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{notice|This page is currently being utilised for discussion of an unblock request by Realist 2. Comments on this topic are welcome, but please remain calm and civil at all times.}} | |||
| ==3RR== | |||
| {{collapse top|Original block notice|bg=none|border=1px solid grey}} | |||
| 27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Realist2_reported_by_Kookoo_Star_.28Result:_72_hours.29 | 27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Realist2_reported_by_Kookoo_Star_.28Result:_72_hours.29 | ||
| As of now, it looks like there won't be a block, but I'm not an admin. The report as filed was incomplete, and it hasn't been fixed yet. I don't know how long it takes before reports are considered stale, but blocking days later would be harder to justify as preventative instead of punitive. I will say that even if you didn't technically make 3 reverts, it would still likely be looked at as edit warring, especially since you're just coming off a block. Also, "tag-teaming" doesn't justify breaking 3rr. In cases that aren't blatant vandalism, you should consider a ] or ] instead of an edit war. --]]] 19:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC) | As of now, it looks like there won't be a block, but I'm not an admin. The report as filed was incomplete, and it hasn't been fixed yet. I don't know how long it takes before reports are considered stale, but blocking days later would be harder to justify as preventative instead of punitive. I will say that even if you didn't technically make 3 reverts, it would still likely be looked at as edit warring, especially since you're just coming off a block. Also, "tag-teaming" doesn't justify breaking 3rr. In cases that aren't blatant vandalism, you should consider a ] or ] instead of an edit war. --]]] 19:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:72 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:]: directly after release of block|''']: directly after release of block'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 11:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> —]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 11:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | <div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:72 hours|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours'''|You have been temporarily ''']''' from editing}} in accordance with ] for {{#if:]: directly after release of block|''']: directly after release of block'''|repeated ]}}. Please stop. You're welcome to ] after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 11:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block2 --> —]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 11:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| {{collapse bottom}} | |||
| {| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | {| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;" | ||
| |- | |- | ||
Revision as of 19:50, 7 March 2008
 | This page is currently being utilised for discussion of an unblock request by Realist 2. Comments on this topic are welcome, but please remain calm and civil at all times. |
| Original block notice |
|---|
|
27_noticeboard/3RR#User:Realist2_reported_by_Kookoo_Star_.28Result:_72_hours.29 As of now, it looks like there won't be a block, but I'm not an admin. The report as filed was incomplete, and it hasn't been fixed yet. I don't know how long it takes before reports are considered stale, but blocking days later would be harder to justify as preventative instead of punitive. I will say that even if you didn't technically make 3 reverts, it would still likely be looked at as edit warring, especially since you're just coming off a block. Also, "tag-teaming" doesn't justify breaking 3rr. In cases that aren't blatant vandalism, you should consider a request for comment or third opinion instead of an edit war. --Onorem♠Dil 19:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 |
|
Your request to be unblocked is currently being considered by an administrator, and has been suspended in the meanwhile. This template has replaced the original unblock request in order to prevent duplication of request consideration by multiple administrators. If a considerable time has passed since the request was removed (see above for time of removal), any editor may replace the unblock request, by reverting using the page history. You may not remove this template from your page. |