| Revision as of 23:19, 21 March 2008 editRobJ1981 (talk | contribs)32,546 edits List of characters in Bully← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 21 March 2008 edit undoDan the Man1983 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,687 edits →List of characters in BullyNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| You and Dan need to settle down and stop nitpicking many edits to the article. The section called: new people stopping by to edit (February 2008) was uncivil. In that section, you stated "I'm going to make it policy to delete all the tags put up by driveby editors", which is also uncivil. As I stated in that section: people can place tags and not discuss things, it's not a crime. Stop being overprotective over the article, just because tags are placed and the editor doesn't discuss. Discuss the tag on talk, then if it's not needed: remove AFTER discussion, not beforehand. Then there is the whole villain/nemesis nonsense. One word shouldn't be such a big deal. Just because a source uses that word, doesn't mean the article must have it listed the same way. Further article controlling will force me to make a discussion at an admin notice board about this. You and Dan watch the page/obsess with it a bit too much, and it certainly needs to stop. ] (]) 23:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | You and Dan need to settle down and stop nitpicking many edits to the article. The section called: new people stopping by to edit (February 2008) was uncivil. In that section, you stated "I'm going to make it policy to delete all the tags put up by driveby editors", which is also uncivil. As I stated in that section: people can place tags and not discuss things, it's not a crime. Stop being overprotective over the article, just because tags are placed and the editor doesn't discuss. Discuss the tag on talk, then if it's not needed: remove AFTER discussion, not beforehand. Then there is the whole villain/nemesis nonsense. One word shouldn't be such a big deal. Just because a source uses that word, doesn't mean the article must have it listed the same way. Further article controlling will force me to make a discussion at an admin notice board about this. You and Dan watch the page/obsess with it a bit too much, and it certainly needs to stop. ] (]) 23:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Rob you state that placing a tag and not discussing it isn't a crime, which is true. But just to play devils advocate with you, making sure an article and editing day in and day out to make sure the article is neat, tidy and up to standards is also not a crime. | |||
| :Deleting the tag and making a suggestion like McJeff did is not a crime and isn't against Misplaced Pages policy(not to my knowledge anyways). Article controlling like you claim me and McJeff do is also not a crime or against Misplaced Pages policy(Once again not to my knowledge). | |||
| :Infact I suggest bringing in a admin, because all this bickering is getting out of hand. ] (]) 23:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:37, 21 March 2008
List of characters in Bully
You and Dan need to settle down and stop nitpicking many edits to the article. The section called: new people stopping by to edit (February 2008) was uncivil. In that section, you stated "I'm going to make it policy to delete all the tags put up by driveby editors", which is also uncivil. As I stated in that section: people can place tags and not discuss things, it's not a crime. Stop being overprotective over the article, just because tags are placed and the editor doesn't discuss. Discuss the tag on talk, then if it's not needed: remove AFTER discussion, not beforehand. Then there is the whole villain/nemesis nonsense. One word shouldn't be such a big deal. Just because a source uses that word, doesn't mean the article must have it listed the same way. Further article controlling will force me to make a discussion at an admin notice board about this. You and Dan watch the page/obsess with it a bit too much, and it certainly needs to stop. RobJ1981 (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Rob you state that placing a tag and not discussing it isn't a crime, which is true. But just to play devils advocate with you, making sure an article and editing day in and day out to make sure the article is neat, tidy and up to standards is also not a crime.
- Deleting the tag and making a suggestion like McJeff did is not a crime and isn't against Misplaced Pages policy(not to my knowledge anyways). Article controlling like you claim me and McJeff do is also not a crime or against Misplaced Pages policy(Once again not to my knowledge).
- Infact I suggest bringing in a admin, because all this bickering is getting out of hand. Dan the Man1983 (talk) 23:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)