Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Science today: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:12, 3 August 2005 editAlex.tan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,403 edits []: delete← Previous edit Revision as of 06:01, 3 August 2005 edit undoVerbewarp (talk | contribs)6 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
* '''Delete''' I also suspect copyvio, but I guess it's from some page too new to be indexed by google. <] ]> 05:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC) * '''Delete''' I also suspect copyvio, but I guess it's from some page too new to be indexed by google. <] ]> 05:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. No original research, though I wonder if it's just nonsense. ] 05:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. No original research, though I wonder if it's just nonsense. ] 05:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Are you all mad? copyright violation? too new to be indexed by google? no original research? "I guess..." - "..just nonsense.." It is clear that none of you have any idea what you are talking about; sadly --peter 06:01, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:01, 3 August 2005

Science today

POV essay. No factual content to be salvaged. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:09, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Are you all mad? copyright violation? too new to be indexed by google? no original research? "I guess..." - "..just nonsense.." It is clear that none of you have any idea what you are talking about; sadly --peter 06:01, August 3, 2005 (UTC)