Revision as of 05:12, 3 August 2005 editAlex.tan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,403 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:01, 3 August 2005 edit undoVerbewarp (talk | contribs)6 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* '''Delete''' I also suspect copyvio, but I guess it's from some page too new to be indexed by google. <] ]> 05:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' I also suspect copyvio, but I guess it's from some page too new to be indexed by google. <] ]> 05:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. No original research, though I wonder if it's just nonsense. ] 05:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. No original research, though I wonder if it's just nonsense. ] 05:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC) | ||
Are you all mad? copyright violation? too new to be indexed by google? no original research? "I guess..." - "..just nonsense.." It is clear that none of you have any idea what you are talking about; sadly --peter 06:01, August 3, 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:01, 3 August 2005
Science today
POV essay. No factual content to be salvaged. Delete. -- Antaeus Feldspar 03:09, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. POV rant. ManoaChild 04:58, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I also suspect copyvio, but I guess it's from some page too new to be indexed by google. <drini ☎> 05:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. No original research, though I wonder if it's just nonsense. Alex.tan 05:12, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
Are you all mad? copyright violation? too new to be indexed by google? no original research? "I guess..." - "..just nonsense.." It is clear that none of you have any idea what you are talking about; sadly --peter 06:01, August 3, 2005 (UTC)