| Revision as of 00:11, 4 August 2005 editABCD (talk | contribs)11,256 edits close discussion: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:56, 20 September 2005 edit undoUncle G's major work 'bot (talk | contribs)51,901 editsm Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Christian neoteny moved to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Christian neotenyNext edit → |
| (No difference) | |
Revision as of 20:56, 20 September 2005
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Christian_neoteny
The article is a Neologism, goes against the policy Misplaced Pages:No_original_research, and basically advertises the author's pet theory. This page, and the author's website were linked-to from Neoteny. Try a google search on "Christian Neoteny". Dosai 18:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, original research / soapbox. Tempshill 18:25, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete drini ☎ 21:08, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete original research.-Poli (talk • contribs) 23:16, 2005 July 25 (UTC)
- Delete POV original research. JamesBurns 08:17, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete POV Mccready 08:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.