Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:04, 8 August 2005

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 20:11, August 7, 2005 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 19:00, 10 January 2025 (UTC).

• (Rainbowwarrior1977 | talk | contributions)

Statement of the dispute

Description

Rainbowwarrior1977 (talk · contribs) has engaged in a series of disruptive behavior on Misplaced Pages. He has:

• Engaged in personal attacks against other users
• Engaged in RfA fraud
• Engaged in article vandalism
• Engaged in userpage vandalism
• Engaged in misuse of CSD templates
• Engaged in sockpuppetry
• Used insulting and/or attacking edit summaries
• Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions
• Lied repeatedly about himself, and attacked users who questioned his claims

This user appears to be a sockpuppet of Musachachado (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). He confirms this himself in this edit. A large number of his edits are for the purpose of harassing/attacking other users or otherwise disrupting Misplaced Pages.

Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

1. Engaged in personal attacks against other users:
   • a Midwestern US red-state lout such as yourself
   • I dated her daughter Larissa some time ago. She's quite the tart
   • I highly doubt if you have the authority to do that. You are crossing the line, my boy. (Re: Linuxbeak removing his RfA as fraud.)
   • {{db|Casito is a huge dork!}}
   • Yes, this is exactly the kind of heavy-handed and arrogant attitude that Casito shows in his edits.
   • your threats of prosecution only serve to show your ignorance and insecurity.
   • Hey, I said it was "a" seat, not "the" seat, you dumb motherf#@$ker!! Learn how to read English. Soon I shall be an administrator and have you purged from this noble experiment
   • Geogre probably did not read the article, having been to busy puttering about with his Dungeons and Dragons nineteen-side dice
2. Engaged in RfA fraud
   • The History of RfA reveals his repeated re-insertion of his RfA after several admins removed it as improper.
   • RfA/Rainbowwarrior1977 revals his efforts to disrupt RfA and use his entry to attack others.
   • This edit suggests a less-than-honorable intent for seeking adminship.
   • Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Purplefeltangel Nominated Purplefeltangel for adminship without her consent. The nomination was subsequently closed early at her request.
   • Removes all other active RfA's and replaces them with copies of his own in retaliation for his being removed.
3. Engaged in article vandalism
   • Vandalism of Slippery Jack.
   • Added "Category:Great Homosexuals in Modern Western History" to Ken Mehlman (the chair of the RNC). There appears to be speculation about Mehlman's sexuality, but the tag is inappropriate nonetheless.
   • Note:(In certain subcultures in the English-speaking world, the term "gay" does not denote "lighthearted," as is the dictionary definition, but rather has taken on the additional meaning of "homosexual," or more specifically "rump raider."
   • Inserted reference to apparently non-existant British general.
4. Engaged in userpage vandalism
   • {{db|Casito is a huge dork!}} added to User talk:Casito/Archive 1
   • Added strikeout to Casito's archive.
   • {{nonsense}} added to User talk:Casito/Archive 1
   • Removed link from User talk:Casito/Archive 1
   • Removed link from User talk:Casito/Archive 1
5. Engaged in misuse of CSD templates
   • {{db|Casito is a huge dork!}} added to User talk:Casito/Archive 1
   • {{nonsense}} added to User talk:Casito/Archive 1
   • {{d}} added to Mark Bortz
6. Engaged in sockpuppetry
   • In this edit he admits to being
   • The posts in Castio's Archive show that SamuraiBoywithaDrugProblem (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is his sockpuppet.
   • Pamstar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) nominated him for VfD; claims to be his wife. Special:Contributions/Pamstar shows her involvement at Sasquatch's RfA and that nominating Rainbowwarrior1977 was her tenth edit. Her userpage shows the same pattern as Rainbowwarrior1977's: born in South America, grew up in Florida.
7. Used insulting and/or attacking edit summaries
   • This man cant handle the truth. You cannot delete comments from a talk page. I should report you.
   • You dont have the power to delete comments on your user page. Sorry chump!
   • Typo fix of "maternity." Oh by the way, Jane Swift WICKED F'N SUCKS!!
   • Rebuttal to the last nincompoop His first edit, by the way.
8. Attacked other users, particularly admins, who have corrected his actions
   • I highly doubt if you have the authority to do that. You are crossing the line, my boy.
   • My dear old boy, before you engage in any more virulent attacks on my background I suggest you review the corpus of my substantive contributions to wikipedia, especially those concerning the law.
   • Entire post
   • All his posts in Castio's Archive
   • And no, you cannot remove the tag, son (Responding to Everyking's suggestion that the VfD tag should be removed from Ainu people.)
9. Lied repeatedly about himself, and attacked users who questioned his claims
   • Claims to be a fifteen year old.
   • Claims to have "passed the Florida bar exam last year."
   • Claims to have an NYU law degree.
   • Claims Pamstar is his wife.
   • Claims to have dated the daughter of a Cambrige professor "some time ago."
   • Attacks me for removing his RfA nomination as bad faith.
   • Attacks Linuxbeak for removing his RfA as bad faith.
   • Attacks Soltak for questioning his claims. Twice.

Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. WP:NPA
2. WP:Vandalism
3. WP:SOCK
4. WP:BLOCK For evading a block with a sockpuppet.
5. WP:CIVIL
6. WP:RFA
7. WP:POINT

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. Casito attempts to resolve the "legal threats" dispute
2. Manning Bartlett warns about CSD violations. Twice.
3. Linuxbeak warns about RfA. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Rainbowwarrior1977&diff=20421991&oldid=20421434 And blocks for 30 mins.
4. Uncle Ed warns about CSD abuse.
5. Rusty2005 warns about civility.
6. Soltak warns about deception. [http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Rainbowwarrior1977&diff=20491255&oldid=20490172 Twice. And adds a note about NPA and civility.
7. I raised the alarm on AN/I.
8. Ryan tries to reason with him.
9. Zscout370 also tries reasoning.
10. Numerous editors commented at the RfA.

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

1. Essjay · Talk 23:28, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
2. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 23:54, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

Other involved users

1. I haven't given up resolving the dispute yet. I advised LinuxBeav (via IRC) to try a short block first. There have been no other blocks since that 30-minute block. Uncle Ed 00:04, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.