Revision as of 21:58, 14 April 2008 editGijsvdL (talk | contribs)266 edits →Melody Amber← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:10, 14 April 2008 edit undoRoadcreature (talk | contribs)4,347 edits →Melody AmberNext edit → | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Please cease edit warring over the references at ]. The links that were reinserted by Jisis are not self-promotion; it's the proper method of providing sources to the article. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with accordingly. ] (]) 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | Please cease edit warring over the references at ]. The links that were reinserted by Jisis are not self-promotion; it's the proper method of providing sources to the article. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with accordingly. ] (]) 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
:<big>'''You'''</big> are the vandal in this case. NL.wiki arbcom has taken severe measures against you, just because your shameless self promotion. ] (]) 21:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | :<big>'''You'''</big> are the vandal in this case. NL.wiki arbcom has taken severe measures against you, just because your shameless self promotion. ] (]) 21:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Suit yourself, keep lying. ] (]) 22:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:10, 14 April 2008
|
Edit warring over attribution
Please cease edit warring over the required attribution at Melody Thomas Scott. The link Mike Halterman is adding is not spam; it's the proper method of attribution as verified by the Foundation. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with appropriately. krimpet✽ 19:03, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- You could at least have prevented a revert at Commons by proper use of the edit summary. GijsvdL (talk) 21:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- And you could stop sniping at people and making people lose patience with you on both en and nl. Just stop it. Mike H. Fierce! 23:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Melody Amber
Please cease edit warring over the references at Melody Amber. The links that were reinserted by Jisis are not self-promotion; it's the proper method of providing sources to the article. Further reverting will be considered disruption and will be dealt with accordingly. Guido den Broeder (talk) 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- You are the vandal in this case. NL.wiki arbcom has taken severe measures against you, just because your shameless self promotion. GijsvdL (talk) 21:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Suit yourself, keep lying. Guido den Broeder (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)