| Revision as of 13:22, 21 April 2008 editWizardman (talk | contribs)Administrators400,781 edits start | Revision as of 04:44, 22 April 2008 edit undoShii (talk | contribs)21,017 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| : {{al|Matsuo Bashō|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"></span> | : {{al|Matsuo Bashō|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand"></span> | ||
| : {{GAR/current}} I am asking for a reassessment/delisting as it fails section two of the good article criteria, "It is factually accurate and verifiable." More accurately, it fails 2b, "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". With virtually no inline citations I don't see this as a GA. ] 13:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | : {{GAR/current}} I am asking for a reassessment/delisting as it fails section two of the good article criteria, "It is factually accurate and verifiable." More accurately, it fails 2b, "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". With virtually no inline citations I don't see this as a GA. ] 13:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Every statement in this article is cited. Inline citations are not and have never been necessary on Misplaced Pages. ] ] 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:44, 22 April 2008
Matsuo Bashō
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page
- Result pending I am asking for a reassessment/delisting as it fails section two of the good article criteria, "It is factually accurate and verifiable." More accurately, it fails 2b, "at minimum, provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". With virtually no inline citations I don't see this as a GA. Wizardman 13:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Every statement in this article is cited. Inline citations are not and have never been necessary on Misplaced Pages. Shii (tock) 04:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)