Revision as of 02:37, 3 May 2008 editUseight (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Administrators78,696 edits added comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:41, 3 May 2008 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 4d) to User talk:Allstarecho/Archive 9.Next edit → | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
{{User:Allstarecho/archhidden}} | {{User:Allstarecho/archhidden}} | ||
<!--COMMENTS GO BELOW HERE, DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE HERE! DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE HERE AND THIS INCLUDES REMOVING CATEGORIES! --> | <!--COMMENTS GO BELOW HERE, DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE HERE! DO NOT EDIT ANYTHING ABOVE HERE AND THIS INCLUDES REMOVING CATEGORIES! --> | ||
== ] == | |||
He has to be the most bored person on this planet. I hope he reads this too. He just likes to argue and have the last word even if he is completely wrong. Notice not a single admin has replied to him and notice he didn't deny that he was watchlisting your page and removed those categories on purpose while you were away. I'm waiting for him to run to ANI and say, "APK said I was bored!! That's a personal attack! Someone, pay attention to me!!" ] (]) 05:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
:It's so obvious to anyone who knows the history beginning with the userbox issue, to the removal of categories from my user page, what his motive is here. This is why I will not participate any further in the discussion at WQA. Beating a dead horse indeed, let him beat himself to death. And as if I've had much time to write any articles.. no, I've only been dealing with my home having burned down. I know that's been made clear to anyone who keeps up with this page but I guess some people just don't get obviousness. Then again, anyone crying "write an article!" would do well to follow that advice rather than worry about some content on a humor page that doesn't mention a single person. Personal attack indeed. ;] '''-''' <font size="+1" color="red">✰</font><strong style="letter-spacing:1px;font-family:Verdana">]</strong><font size="+1" color="red">✰</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 10:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
::Seriously, how old is ? I ''love'' how he's telling me to go work on articles. Compare his to . He's one of those kids that always wants the last word. It makes him feel he's right. Still, no admins have replied to his pointless posts and what makes it fun is that I know he's reading this. Anyway, so how is the house situation coming along? I know you said you're out of a hotel room. Did you tell the insurance company that they're gonna sleep with the fishes if they don't pay you a million dollars? (I asked my cousin, Vinnie, to pay them a visit if they don't.) :P ] (]) 13:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
== UM ACT scores == | |||
Could you take a look at the ACT thread here? ] ] (]) 17:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
== Sanctions == | == Sanctions == | ||
Line 132: | Line 122: | ||
== Template == | == Template == | ||
I'm quite familiar with that template, as you might guess, as I am also a "regular." However, the willful, improper blanking of my contribution was so egregious that in this particular case I believe my use of that template was more than warranted. ] (]) 00:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | I'm quite familiar with that template, as you might guess, as I am also a "regular." However, the willful, improper blanking of my contribution was so egregious that in this particular case I believe my use of that template was more than warranted. ] (]) 00:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
Line 137: | Line 128: | ||
:]. Regardless, you could have simply asked why she blanked something before being a ] about it with a generic "don't do that" template. '''-''' <font size="+1" color="red">✰</font><strong style="letter-spacing:1px;font-family:Verdana">]</strong><font size="+1" color="red">✰</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | :]. Regardless, you could have simply asked why she blanked something before being a ] about it with a generic "don't do that" template. '''-''' <font size="+1" color="red">✰</font><strong style="letter-spacing:1px;font-family:Verdana">]</strong><font size="+1" color="red">✰</font> <sup><small>]</small></sup> 00:31, 28 April 2008 (UTC) | ||
==New Project== | == New Project == | ||
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active. | Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active. | ||
Revision as of 12:41, 3 May 2008
NOTICE | ||
Per this discussion, do NOT remove any categories from my page, even if they are red-linked or have been deleted. I will revert. Also, do not edit any of my code. I will revert. Thank you and good day. |
Contents |
---|
Welcome! I will reply to you on this page unless you request otherwise. Please watch this page if you comment. Further, please note:
And finally:
My personal stress button
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
SanctionsAdd to if you have time. Anyway, I hope you are doing well. miranda 22:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: ArbYeah sorry about that - was meant to post a link to it in the edit summary (must've forgotten). Ncmvocalist (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Eleanor RooseveltHi, if you review the talk page of this article you will see that the inclusion of references to Roosevelt's possible lesbian relationship has been the subject of extensive debate, and the consensus view has been that as there's no strong evidence which supports the claims that she had lesbian relationships the article shouldn't portray her as a lesbian. I suggest that you engage the editors with an interest in Eleanor Roosevelt in discussion before riding roughshod over this consensus. Cheers, --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:46, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
TemplateI'm quite familiar with that template, as you might guess, as I am also a "regular." However, the willful, improper blanking of my contribution was so egregious that in this particular case I believe my use of that template was more than warranted. Badagnani (talk) 00:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC) Oh, I see, you're a friend of the editor whom I templated. Whatever the case, improper blanking cannot be supported, whether or not we are a friend of the editor who conducted such improper blanking. Badagnani (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
New ProjectMyself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active. If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Misplaced Pages namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:37, 3 May 2008 (UTC) |