| Revision as of 15:53, 12 May 2008 editKww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits Merge bulbasaur back, protect the redirect← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:26, 12 May 2008 edit undoKung Fu Man (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,714 edits →Bulbasaur remergeNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| ==Bulbasaur remerge== | ==Bulbasaur remerge== | ||
| Someone (not me) put a merge tag on Bulbasaur. I wholeheartedly endorse it, and, when it is done, let's protect the redirect this time. Many years have gone by, and no one has found independent, third-party sourcing for anything related to Bulbasaur. It's all "official game guides", sponsored novels, sponsored this, sponsored that. If Bulbasaur hasn't been covered by third-parties yet, it never will be. Time to give up ... it will never be an acceptable article in terms of sourcing.] (]) 15:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | Someone (not me) put a merge tag on Bulbasaur. I wholeheartedly endorse it, and, when it is done, let's protect the redirect this time. Many years have gone by, and no one has found independent, third-party sourcing for anything related to Bulbasaur. It's all "official game guides", sponsored novels, sponsored this, sponsored that. If Bulbasaur hasn't been covered by third-parties yet, it never will be. Time to give up ... it will never be an acceptable article in terms of sourcing.] (]) 15:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Well someone apparently has, under the reasoning "if some are on a list all should be" @_@. Along those lines he put up a merge proposal on ] and ] for the same reason. Bulbasaur...I really don't know in all honesty. It's a former featured article, so that at least leaves some indication it could be repaired, so I'm divided. But if it's merged I won't object either really. | |||
| :Now, as for Pikachu and Jigglypuff...both of those could be salvaged, and I'm working on the Jigglypuff one atm to try and do that (see its ]). And Pikachu's notable enough given he's outright compared to the japanese equivalent of Mickey Mouse, so while not a stellar article a merge proposal shove on it is senseless.--] (]) 20:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:26, 12 May 2008
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Pokémon/Archive 2 page. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This non-existent page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
| Template:NESproj Template:PCP | |
 Archives |
Old/short regional numbers...
Originally I wanted the page to have all the regional Pokedex numbers on it, but thinking about it, the page is very, very large now, but in the future the numbering systems will only grow. Therefore I suggest we remove the Ranger Browser numbers from the list. It's not really part of the main series, and isn't that important, almost falling into a game-guide area. In the future as other systems come up, especially in remakes, they'll probably be longer and more inclusive. So for now, I suggest we remove the Ranger numbers, and if it's agreed I'll do it myself. Later we can consider others. - MK ( /contribs ) 12:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- And, if/when we decide, I made the edit here. - MK ( /contribs ) 14:45, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
#494
Please stop adding additional pokemon to this table. There are no other pokemon. Anything found with Gameshark is original research. Please read WP:OR before even considering adding something like this TheBilly (talk) 12:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Protection
I think this page should be at least semi perotected, so much vanalism (#494 and such). --Kuriza (talk) 04:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Female Nidoran
While looking at this in boredom, I saw that the Trademarked Romanization of the Female Nidoran said "Vagina", and it seems to have been there for a while. Yet, when I translated the Kanji or whatever of the female Nidoran, it still came up as "Nidoran" instead of "Vagina". So I believe somebody forgot to fix this. Sir Sanjuro (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 02:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for bringing this to attention. It looks like a case where we just missed some vandalism. I've fixed it now. MelicansMatkin (talk) 14:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Un-merge
I think the List of Pokémon should be un-merged back into individual articles, because the lists contain virtually no information compared to the original articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.250.214.9 (talk) 12:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
- Negative. Allmost all of the Pokémon are not notable enough to have their own pages on Misplaced Pages. If you want individual articles, go to Bulbapedia. Cheers, Face 20:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Bulbasaur remerge
Someone (not me) put a merge tag on Bulbasaur. I wholeheartedly endorse it, and, when it is done, let's protect the redirect this time. Many years have gone by, and no one has found independent, third-party sourcing for anything related to Bulbasaur. It's all "official game guides", sponsored novels, sponsored this, sponsored that. If Bulbasaur hasn't been covered by third-parties yet, it never will be. Time to give up ... it will never be an acceptable article in terms of sourcing.Kww (talk) 15:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well someone apparently has, under the reasoning "if some are on a list all should be" @_@. Along those lines he put up a merge proposal on Pikachu and Jigglypuff for the same reason. Bulbasaur...I really don't know in all honesty. It's a former featured article, so that at least leaves some indication it could be repaired, so I'm divided. But if it's merged I won't object either really.
- Now, as for Pikachu and Jigglypuff...both of those could be salvaged, and I'm working on the Jigglypuff one atm to try and do that (see its talk page). And Pikachu's notable enough given he's outright compared to the japanese equivalent of Mickey Mouse, so while not a stellar article a merge proposal shove on it is senseless.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2008 (UTC)