Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tiggerjay: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:39, 27 May 2008 editWrcousert (talk | contribs)16 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:40, 27 May 2008 edit undoSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,867 editsm Signing comment by Wrcousert - ""Next edit →
Line 85: Line 85:


== Please stop making test edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Disneyland Park (Anaheim). It is considered vandalism, which, under Misplaced Pages policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)== == Please stop making test edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Disneyland Park (Anaheim). It is considered vandalism, which, under Misplaced Pages policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)==
My edit was NOT a test edit.Google Fabulous Disney Babe. Block my edits and not only will I sue wikipeida, but you as well. My edit was NOT a test edit.Google Fabulous Disney Babe. Block my edits and not only will I sue wikipeida, but you as well. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 02:40, 27 May 2008

Today is Wednesday, January 8. Tiggerjay's local time is: 14:42
:: When am I online - editing trends

The following is a chart which illustrates Tiggerjay's typical editing trends (updated December 2012, using UMT time-zone). My most active times are between 11pm and 5am UMT (3pm and 9pm local time).. I tend to take various wikibreaks from time to time for several months on end.


Current status: Template:Ustatus/ColourCoded
                        
User Talk Contribs Sandbox Email

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Archiving icon
Archives

/Archive Older Stuff
/Archive April 2008
/Archive May 2008
/Archive Thanks
Note: archives may be refactored.

If you are here to register a complaint regarding my edits, before doing so please note:
  1. This editor believes in Misplaced Pages:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
  2. Check and make sure that your edit has a valid, reliable source
  3. Understand that I do not want to see valid articles, content or images deleted
  4. I disclose that I sometimes make mistakes, and you are at liberty to revert my edits.


Abusive IP User Watch

Greater Grace World Outreach

Hi, thank you for your edits of the GGWO article. I am now in an editting dispute with someone else and so got the page protected. As a neutral party, can you please help us through this dispute? Spinkava (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Oh my, I'm gone for the weekend and look what breaks out... I'm too busy at the moment to resolve this right now, but will look into it later today. Tiggerjay (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Greater Grace World Outreach

Thank you for your involvement with editing this page and your interest in having a consensus reached in this article so the block can be lifted and the article to be brought to some sort of consensus. I was brought in by a request on the Christianity Project page to have someone review the article. I have absolutely no former knowledge of GGWO, nor any particular bias. All I can tell you it in its current state, it looks like an absolute disaster (both the article, and the organization as a whole). My hopes is to help bring the interested editors to the table on the talk page to resolve the conflicts and have the page properly created/edited. Please take a moment to go over to the talk page and review my most recent postings. Also do no be alarmed as your earlier comments/posts were refactored and archived (there is a link available on the page to the archive). My post is only one of several which will hopefully help guide this page towards something everybody can agree is appropriate. Tiggerjay (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I wish you the best of luck regarding this page. I cannot be part of any effort that abuses the ideas of developing a good article to the point of trashing peoples edits. While I strongly disagree with those who have edits for GGWO I would not simply undo their work or remove their work which has been done so many times I cannot count. It is as though we have admins supporting the efforts of vandals. Again I think that regardless of the opinion editors should try at best to respect the work of others. I have done so. But that appears to be unacceptable by my peers.
To which I say this article will either be useless or a promotion of GGWO.
Tryster (talk) 01:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

dude - i just corrected a spelling mistake exlusively = exclusively.

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to White Paper of 1939 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Consistency of style

You have reverted my correction to Jeremy Vine because you claim it was not constructive. I beg to differ. The dates have no consistency of style. The styles appear are May 17, 17 May, and May 17th. I made them consistent. Constructive? I think so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.17.54 (talk) 07:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to make this article consistant any way you like, but please be sure to use an Edit Summary. Thanks. Tiggerjay (talk) 07:38, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I have now signed on using my user name.

Your revert of my Vine correction resulted in a factual error being reinstated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brenmar (talk • contribs) 07:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but you still need to remember to sign your posts using ~~~~. Also you are welcome to revert my revert. See WP:BRD --- as stated at the top of my talk page. Tiggerjay (talk) 07:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Dodgers

Calling the placement of accurate tags on pages unconstructive is your own opinion, and while it is fine that you have that opinion, it is not ok that you attempt to implement your opinions as Wiki policy.--danielfolsom 01:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

What I assume you're talking about is this diff. What I noticed while performing WP:RCP is the math formula template/test. What I did not notice was your {{OR}} tag. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

your reversion here

Why did you make the reversion above and then warn the previous editor for vandalism?--Rockfang (talk) 01:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Darn good question, looks like a slip of the mouse while using WP:HUGGLE. Tiggerjay (talk) 01:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Disneyland Park (Anaheim). It is considered vandalism, which, under Misplaced Pages policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Tiggerjay (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

My edit was NOT a test edit.Google Fabulous Disney Babe. Block my edits and not only will I sue wikipeida, but you as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrcousert (talk • contribs) 02:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)