Misplaced Pages

Talk:Iraq Veterans for Congress: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:43, 27 May 2008 editEjosse1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,858 editsm wpmilhist detag← Previous edit Revision as of 05:41, 24 July 2009 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,571,686 editsm Replacing {{WikiProjectBanners}}: merge numbered parameters, remove obsolete 'nested', and change to WPBS (2 banners) per consensusNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{calm talk}} {{calm talk}}
{{controversial}} {{controversial}}
{{WPBS|1=
{{WikiProjectBanners
⚫ {{WP Iraq|class = start|importance =low}}
|1=
⚫ {{WikiProjectPolitics|class=start|importance=low}}
|2=
⚫ |3={{WP Iraq|class = start|importance =low|nested=yes}}
⚫ |4={{WikiProjectPolitics|class=start|importance=low|nested=yes|nested=yes}}
}} }}
{{talkheader}} {{talkheader}}

Revision as of 05:41, 24 July 2009

Skip to table of contents
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconIraq Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Iraq Veterans for Congress article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
A fact from Iraq Veterans for Congress appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 April 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Misplaced Pages:Recent additions/2008/April.
Misplaced Pages
Categories: