Misplaced Pages

Haim Farhi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:09, 31 May 2008 editLightmouse (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers148,333 edits Units/dates/other using AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 14:25, 3 June 2008 edit undoNishidani (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users99,541 edits Copyedited text, provided two new refs.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
] near a sign commemorating Farhi. The Hebrew inscription on the sign reads: ''Farhi vs. Napoleon. Jezzar's right hand in resisting ] harsh siege was the Jewish Haim Farhi, senior adviser and minister of finance'']] ] near a sign commemorating Farhi. The Hebrew inscription on the sign reads: ''Farhi vs. Napoleon. Jezzar's right hand in resisting ] harsh siege was the Jewish Haim Farhi, senior adviser and minister of finance'']]
'''Haim Farhi''' (also '''Chaim''', '''Farkhi''') ({{lang-he|חיים פרחי}}, {{lang-ar|حاييم فرحي}}, also known as '''Haim "El Muallim"''' lit. "The Teacher"), (] - ] ]) was the ] adviser for the rulers of the ] in the days of the ], and during ]'s travels in south west of the ]. '''Haim Farhi''' (also '''Chaim''', '''Farkhi''') ({{lang-he|חיים פרחי}}, {{lang-ar|حاييم فرحي}}, also known as '''Haim "El Muallim"''' lit. "The Teacher"), (] - ] ]) was a ] adviser for rulers of the ] in the days of the ], and during ]'s invasion of the southern ].


He was a central figure in the pilgrimage of the students of the ], in 1777, and their absorption in the Galilee, and also in repelling Napoleon's siege of the city of ] in 1799. Prime Minister, Financial Vizier and de facto ruler of Acre and its region from 1795 to 1819. He was assassinated in August that year. He also played a central role both in the 1777 pilgrimage of students of the ] and in facilitating their absorption in the Galilee, and in repelling Napoleon's siege of the city of ] in 1799. He was Prime Minister, Financial Vizier and ''de facto'' ruler of Acre and its region from 1795 to 1819. He was assassinated in August of that that year.


==Historical background== ==Historical background==
After the Ottoman empire's conquest of the Levant from the ] in the year 1516, Galilee became part of the empire. Still, the central Turkish rule was weak. Throughout the empire, which ruled over vast areas in ], ], ], the ] and ], came many local rulers, who created a near-] rule, who had a weak connection with the central government in ]. After the Ottoman empire's conquest of the Levant from the ] in the year 1516, Galilee became part of its empire. However, Turkish rule was weak. Throughout the empire, which extended over vast areas of ], ], ], the ] and ], there arose many local governors, who created a near-] rule, and who maintained weak connections with the central government in ].


The central rule of the '] ]' (northern Israel) was supposed to come from the ] ], where the ] of Damascus would be the person responsible in front of the Ottoman throne (]). During the 18th century rose a strong local leader by the name of ], who cut ties with the empire. This leader was defeated at 1775 by the Turkish officer ], and the Turkish re-established their control over the north of the land. Rule over '] ]' (northern Israel) was supposed to derive from the authority of the ] ], whose ] was held responsible for the area by the Ottoman throne (]). During the 18th century a strong local leader by the name of ] emerged, who effectively severed ties with the empire. This leader was defeated in 1775 by a Turkish officer, the ] ] ], whereupon the Turks managed to reassert their control over the northern areas of the land.


In the days of Dhaher al-Omar and Ahmad al-Jazar, the Galilee was being resettled by Jews. Daher invited ] of ] to return to his ] and resettle ]. In the days of Dhaher al-Omar and Ahmad al-Jazar, the Galilee was undergoing a phase of Jewish resettlement. Daher had invited ] of ] to return to his ] and resettle ].


An existence of a strong local ruling, which enforced and prevented road robbery, as in the days of Dahar and al-Jazar, turned the Galilee to a center of attraction for many - ] from ] and ], and also Jews from the east and the west. The existence of a strong local authority, which enforced the law and prevented road robbery, as was the case in the days of Dahar and al-Jazar, transformed the Galilee region into an attractive area for many immigrants - not only ] from ] and ], but also Jews hailing from the east and west.


==al-Jazar's advisor== ==al-Jazar's advisor==
] ]
Haim Farhi was born to a respected Jewish family in ], and some say{{Who|date=July 2007}} he was related to the royal house of ]. For many years, the family's members, among them Shaul Farhi, Farhi's father, worked as the treasurers of the Damascus district. They may also have mediated between the Jewish community and the law. They tried to alleviate the burden of the taxes on the Jews of ]. Haim Farhi was the banker of the ruler of Damascus. He gained a lot of influence with the Turkish government and became the adviser for the ruler of Acre, ]. al-Jazar recognized his advisor's talents, acted upon his advice, and relieved taxation of the Jewish community on Farhi's request. Haim Farhi was born to a respected Jewish family in ], whose ancestry, according to some, could be traced back to the royal house of ]{{Who|date=July 2007}} . For many years, the family's members, among them Shaul Farhi, Farhi's father, worked as the treasurers of the Damascus district. They may also have mediated between the Jewish community and the law. They tried to alleviate the tax burden placed on the Jews of ]. Haim Farhi rose to be the banker of the ruler of Damascus. He gained extensive influence with the Turkish government and became the adviser to], the ruler of Acre. Al-Jazar recognized his advisor's talents, acted upon his advice, and provided tax relief for the Jewish community at Farhi's request.


Nonetheless, al-Jazar was a violent and cruel individual whose title "al-Jazar" means "The Butcher". In violent attacks, he would find a pretext and harm Farhi: al-Jazar pierced his eye and cut off the edge of his nose. A famous illustration of those days shows al-Jazar sitting in judgment in front of his Jewish adviser, who is wearing an eye patch. Al-Jazar was, nonetheless, a violent and cruel individual whose title 'al-Jazar' means 'The Butcher'. He would often find a pretext to lash out in savage assaults and harm Farhi. In fact, al-Jazar pierced his advisor's eye and cut off one of his nostrils. A famous illustration of those days shows al-Jazar sitting in judgment in front of his Jewish adviser, who is wearing an eye patch.


During the reign of al-Jazar, in 1799, Napoleon tried to conquer the Damascus governorate. In February ] and his army arrived from the south, captured ] and massacred 2000 Turkish prisoners. They then moved north, captured ] and the ] and lay siege to Acre. al-Jazar's troops endured the siege for a month and a half and refused to surrender. These soldiers used the help of English sailors who were under the command of ]. Also, they used an ] expert by the name of Antoine DePhelipoux. During the reign of al-Jazar, in 1799, Napoleon tried to conquer the Damascus governorate. In February ] and his army arrived from the south, captured ] and massacred 2000 Turkish prisoners. They then moved north, captured ] and the ] and lay siege to Acre. al-Jazar's troops withstood the siege for one and a half months, refusing to surrender. These soldiers employed the assistance of English sailors under the command of ]. They also availed themselves of help from an ] expert by the name of Antoine DePhelipoux, who employed artillary the English had intercepted from the French at sea.


The mind behind the defense of ] was Farhi. As the adviser and right hand man of al-Jazar, Farhi had a direct hand at the way the war was run. Farhi and Dephelipoux fought against Napoleon a war full of cruelty and trickery. At its peak, the siege as managed to breach the wall and with many casualties Napoleon's soldiers had tried entering into the city only to discover that within the weeks since the siege has started, Farhi and DePhelipoux have built a second wall, several Feet into the city where al-Jazar's garden was. The construction of the second wall made Napoleon and his men realize that they will probably not be able to take over the city. The siege was removed and Napoleon returned on his way to Egypt. Some say that Napoleon's statement during the war; saying that if he were to succeed and conquer the land it would be returned to the Jews, was meant to capture Farhi’s attention and make him support Napoleon. The mind behind the defense of ] was Farhi. As al-Jazar's advisor and right hand man, Farhi had a direct role in the way the war was run. At the culmination of the assault, the besieging forces managed to make a breach in the walls. After suffering many casualties to open a breach, Napoleon's soldiers found, on trying to penetrate the city, that Farhi and DePhelipoux had, in the meantime, built a second wall, several feet deeper within the city where al-Jazar's garden was. Discovery of this new construction convinced Napoleon and his men that the probability of their taking the citizen was minimal. The siege was raised and Napoleon withdraw to Egypt. Some hold that a statement attributed to Napoleon during the war, according to which he promised to return the land to the Jews if he were to succeed in his conquest of Palestine, was meant to capture Farhi’s attention and make switch his support to Napoleon. However Napoleon never showed any particular interest in winning over the Jews of Palestine during his campaign there<ref>Henry Laurens, ''La Question de Palestine:L'invention de la terre sainte, 1799-1922'', Fayard, Paris 1999 p.18</ref>, though his account of the military campaign records that a rumour among Syrian Jews had it that after Napoleon took Acre, he would go to Jerusalem and restore Solomon's temple.<Franz Kobler, ''Napoleon and the Jews'' Masada Press, Jerusalem,1975 p.51</ref>


== Demise and murder == == Murder ==


After the death of al-Jazar in 1804, the role of ruler of the Galilee was given to his son Sulayman. Sulayman ruled over the region until his death in 1819, when he bequeathed the power to his adopted son Abdullah. After the death of al-Jazar in 1804, the role of ruler of the Galilee passed to his son Sulayman. Sulayman held sway over the region until his death in 1819, when he bequeathed the power to his adopted son Abdullah.


Sulayman continued working with Farhi and utilized him in the same way as his father did, however his adopted son, Abdullah, had made a decision to get rid of Farhi. Farhi got word of the decision but did not escape as he feared for the Jews of the kingdom. Sulayman continued working with Farhi and employed him much as his own father had. However his adopted son, Abdullah, determined to rid himself of Farhi. When Farhi got word of the decision, he refused to flee, for he feared for the Jews of the kingdom.


On ] ], soldiers appeared at Farhi's residence in ], announced that he is a traitor and killed him on the spot by strangling him. His house was ransacked by the soldiers and his family wasn't allowed to bury his body. His family escaped to Damascus but his wife was unable to withstand the hardship of the journey and died along the way in Safed. On ] ], soldiers appeared at Farhi's residence in ], announcing that he was a traitor. They seized him and promptly killed him on the spot by strangulation. They then ransacked his house was ransacked. His family was denied permission to bury his body, and escaped to Damascus. His wife, unable to withstand the rigours of the journey, died on the way, in Safed.


==The vendetta== ==The vendetta==
When word arrived in Damascus about Farhi's death, his brothers; Solomon, Refael and Moshe swore to avenge his killing. They went on to hire Turkish officers in Damascus and ] and requested a ] from the Grand Mufti of Constantinople, the supreme religious authority of the ], that Abdullah was to be killed. When word arrived of Farhi's murder reached Damascus, his brothers, Solomon, Refael and Moshe, swore to avenge him. They hired Turkish officers in Damascus and ] to that purpose and requested a ] to the effect that Abdullah be killed, from the ] of Constantinople, the supreme religious authority of the ].


In April 1821, the Farhi brothers arrived with a large army to the Akko Sanjak. They first conquered the ] defeating Abdullah's armies that came along their way and appointing new rulers to take his place in each region they conquered. When they finally reached ], they kept it under siege for 14 months. During the siege, the eldest brother, Solomon, was poisoned by emissaries of Abdullah and the brothers grew despair of the siege and went back with their troops to Damascus. In April 1821, the Farhi brothers arrived with a large army in the Akko Sanjak. They first conquered the ], defeating the armies Abdullah sent their way and appointing new rulers to take away his authority in every region they conquered. When they finally reached ], they placed it under siege for 14 months. During the siege, the eldest brother, Solomon, was poisoned by Abdullah's emissaries and the surviving brothers, despairing of the siege, withdrew with their troops to Damascus.


==Legacy== ==Legacy==
Farhi's residency still stands today in ], but it is not open for visitors. In ] there is a central city square at the old city in his name. Farhi will be remembered as a contributor to the pilgrimage of the students of the ], in the year 1777, and their absorption in the Galilee. This pilgrimage is considered an important milestone in the Jewish resettlement in the Galilee. Farhi's residency still stands today in ], but it is not open to visitors. Acre also has square in his honour in the old sector of the city. Farhi will be remembered for his role in facilitating the pilgrimage of the students of the ], and their subsequent settlement in the Galilee. This pilgrimage is considered an important milestone in the Jewish resettlement of that area.


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 14:25, 3 June 2008

19th century cannon, set in the wall of Acre near a sign commemorating Farhi. The Hebrew inscription on the sign reads: Farhi vs. Napoleon. Jezzar's right hand in resisting Napoleon's harsh siege was the Jewish Haim Farhi, senior adviser and minister of finance

Haim Farhi (also Chaim, Farkhi) (Template:Lang-he, Template:Lang-ar, also known as Haim "El Muallim" lit. "The Teacher"), (1760 - 21 August 1819) was a Jewish adviser for rulers of the Galilee in the days of the Ottoman Empire, and during Napoleon's invasion of the southern Levant.

He also played a central role both in the 1777 pilgrimage of students of the Baal Shem Tov and in facilitating their absorption in the Galilee, and in repelling Napoleon's siege of the city of Acre in 1799. He was Prime Minister, Financial Vizier and de facto ruler of Acre and its region from 1795 to 1819. He was assassinated in August of that that year.

Historical background

After the Ottoman empire's conquest of the Levant from the Mamluks in the year 1516, Galilee became part of its empire. However, Turkish rule was weak. Throughout the empire, which extended over vast areas of Turkey, Asia, North Africa, the Balkans and Europe, there arose many local governors, who created a near-autonomous rule, and who maintained weak connections with the central government in Istanbul.

Rule over 'Akko Sanjak' (northern Israel) was supposed to derive from the authority of the Damascus governorate, whose governor was held responsible for the area by the Ottoman throne (Turkey). During the 18th century a strong local leader by the name of Dhaher al-Omar emerged, who effectively severed ties with the empire. This leader was defeated in 1775 by a Turkish officer, the Bosnian Mameluk Ahmad al-Jazar, whereupon the Turks managed to reassert their control over the northern areas of the land.

In the days of Dhaher al-Omar and Ahmad al-Jazar, the Galilee was undergoing a phase of Jewish resettlement. Daher had invited Rabbi Chaim Abulafia of İzmir to return to his homeland and resettle Tiberias.

The existence of a strong local authority, which enforced the law and prevented road robbery, as was the case in the days of Dahar and al-Jazar, transformed the Galilee region into an attractive area for many immigrants - not only Arabs from Syria and Lebanon, but also Jews hailing from the east and west.

al-Jazar's advisor

The remains of the internal fortification line erected by Farhi and De-Phelipoux within the walls of Acre, during Napoleons siege, May 1799.

Haim Farhi was born to a respected Jewish family in Damascus, whose ancestry, according to some, could be traced back to the royal house of David . For many years, the family's members, among them Shaul Farhi, Farhi's father, worked as the treasurers of the Damascus district. They may also have mediated between the Jewish community and the law. They tried to alleviate the tax burden placed on the Jews of Safed. Haim Farhi rose to be the banker of the ruler of Damascus. He gained extensive influence with the Turkish government and became the adviser toAhmad al-Jazar, the ruler of Acre. Al-Jazar recognized his advisor's talents, acted upon his advice, and provided tax relief for the Jewish community at Farhi's request.

Al-Jazar was, nonetheless, a violent and cruel individual whose title 'al-Jazar' means 'The Butcher'. He would often find a pretext to lash out in savage assaults and harm Farhi. In fact, al-Jazar pierced his advisor's eye and cut off one of his nostrils. A famous illustration of those days shows al-Jazar sitting in judgment in front of his Jewish adviser, who is wearing an eye patch.

During the reign of al-Jazar, in 1799, Napoleon tried to conquer the Damascus governorate. In February Napoleon and his army arrived from the south, captured Jaffa and massacred 2000 Turkish prisoners. They then moved north, captured Haifa and the Jezreel Valley and lay siege to Acre. al-Jazar's troops withstood the siege for one and a half months, refusing to surrender. These soldiers employed the assistance of English sailors under the command of Admiral Sidney Smith. They also availed themselves of help from an artillery expert by the name of Antoine DePhelipoux, who employed artillary the English had intercepted from the French at sea.

The mind behind the defense of Acre was Farhi. As al-Jazar's advisor and right hand man, Farhi had a direct role in the way the war was run. At the culmination of the assault, the besieging forces managed to make a breach in the walls. After suffering many casualties to open a breach, Napoleon's soldiers found, on trying to penetrate the city, that Farhi and DePhelipoux had, in the meantime, built a second wall, several feet deeper within the city where al-Jazar's garden was. Discovery of this new construction convinced Napoleon and his men that the probability of their taking the citizen was minimal. The siege was raised and Napoleon withdraw to Egypt. Some hold that a statement attributed to Napoleon during the war, according to which he promised to return the land to the Jews if he were to succeed in his conquest of Palestine, was meant to capture Farhi’s attention and make switch his support to Napoleon. However Napoleon never showed any particular interest in winning over the Jews of Palestine during his campaign there, though his account of the military campaign records that a rumour among Syrian Jews had it that after Napoleon took Acre, he would go to Jerusalem and restore Solomon's temple.<Franz Kobler, Napoleon and the Jews Masada Press, Jerusalem,1975 p.51</ref>

Murder

After the death of al-Jazar in 1804, the role of ruler of the Galilee passed to his son Sulayman. Sulayman held sway over the region until his death in 1819, when he bequeathed the power to his adopted son Abdullah.

Sulayman continued working with Farhi and employed him much as his own father had. However his adopted son, Abdullah, determined to rid himself of Farhi. When Farhi got word of the decision, he refused to flee, for he feared for the Jews of the kingdom.

On 21 August 1819, soldiers appeared at Farhi's residence in Acre, announcing that he was a traitor. They seized him and promptly killed him on the spot by strangulation. They then ransacked his house was ransacked. His family was denied permission to bury his body, and escaped to Damascus. His wife, unable to withstand the rigours of the journey, died on the way, in Safed.

The vendetta

When word arrived of Farhi's murder reached Damascus, his brothers, Solomon, Refael and Moshe, swore to avenge him. They hired Turkish officers in Damascus and Aleppo to that purpose and requested a fatwa to the effect that Abdullah be killed, from the Grand Mufti of Constantinople, the supreme religious authority of the Ottoman Empire.

In April 1821, the Farhi brothers arrived with a large army in the Akko Sanjak. They first conquered the Galilee, defeating the armies Abdullah sent their way and appointing new rulers to take away his authority in every region they conquered. When they finally reached Acre, they placed it under siege for 14 months. During the siege, the eldest brother, Solomon, was poisoned by Abdullah's emissaries and the surviving brothers, despairing of the siege, withdrew with their troops to Damascus.

Legacy

Farhi's residency still stands today in Acre, but it is not open to visitors. Acre also has square in his honour in the old sector of the city. Farhi will be remembered for his role in facilitating the pilgrimage of the students of the Baal Shem Tov, and their subsequent settlement in the Galilee. This pilgrimage is considered an important milestone in the Jewish resettlement of that area.

References

  • Avraham Yeari, "Memories of the land of Israel" (זכרונות ארץ ישראל), published by the department of youth matters of the Zionist Histadrut, 1947.

External links

  1. Henry Laurens, La Question de Palestine:L'invention de la terre sainte, 1799-1922, Fayard, Paris 1999 p.18
Categories: