| Revision as of 03:22, 16 June 2008 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,540 edits remove tag, this is not a community decision.← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:35, 16 June 2008 edit undoWAS 4.250 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers18,993 edits {{delete}} Arbcom lacks the right to create policy. There is no "special enforcement" per any policy. The community has a right to create such a policy. Arbcom claims it is not creating policy, thereNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{delete}} | |||
| :'''This case has not yet closed, and therefore the decision is not in effect.''' | |||
| Arbcom lacks the right to create policy. There is no "special enforcement" per any policy. The community has a right to create such a policy. Arbcom claims it is not creating policy, therefore its ruling, whatever it turns out to be, can not create a "special enforcement" that does not exist in any policy. If the community wishes to create a "special enforcement" and this page to manage it, then let us have that discussion. | |||
| Per ] of the ], ] may use special enforcement guidelines in ensuring all pages on Misplaced Pages comply with the ] policy. All such actions by administrators are to be logged at this page. Sanctions may only be imposed if the individual has been counselled and warned regarding the biographies of living persons, and their violations of it. This warning must be linked to from the log entry on this page in order for the sanction to be valid. | |||
| All such actions by administrators pursuant to this ruling may only be overturned by clear community consensus at ], or by the ]. | |||
| {{Quotation|All logged sanctions should be accompanied with evidence of the sanctioned editor being counselled and warned, as per the above. Where an action has been reversed or modified, this should be clearly marked, and must be accompanied by evidence of explicit approval from the Committee, or of clear consensus from the community.|]||from ]}} | |||
| ==Log== | |||
| *{{User13|Example}} is placed under SANCTION A for TIME PERIOD B for VIOLATION C at {{La|Article}} which occurred after being warned at ]. | |||
Revision as of 10:35, 16 June 2008
This redirect may meet Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion, but no reason has been given for why it qualifies. Please ensure that your reason is based on one of the speedy deletion criteria. Replace this tag with {{db|1=some reason}}. NA
If this redirect does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this redirect may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this redirect has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by WAS 4.250 (contribs | logs) at 10:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC) (16 years ago) |
Arbcom lacks the right to create policy. There is no "special enforcement" per any policy. The community has a right to create such a policy. Arbcom claims it is not creating policy, therefore its ruling, whatever it turns out to be, can not create a "special enforcement" that does not exist in any policy. If the community wishes to create a "special enforcement" and this page to manage it, then let us have that discussion.