| Revision as of 04:37, 1 September 2005 editRivGuySC (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,747 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 14:41, 24 February 2006 edit undo24.144.84.178 (talk) Let's give the guy a chance to respondNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. ] 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC) | Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. ] 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Let's give the guy a chance to respond == | |||
| He's planning to email me something. | |||
Revision as of 14:41, 24 February 2006
Is the Travolta reference really necessary? The information can be accessed via the external links. I had originally left it out because it seems to me that an encyclopedia does not legitimately deal in scandal, especially if unsubstantiated. RivGuySC 04:37, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Let's give the guy a chance to respond
He's planning to email me something.