Revision as of 15:48, 7 July 2008 editWiki libs (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers26,887 edits should be a speedy← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:14, 7 July 2008 edit undoBongwarrior (talk | contribs)Administrators158,949 edits Closing debate; result was deleteNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
<!--Template:Afd top | |||
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
The result was '''delete'''. --] (]) 18:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
{{ns:0|M}} | |||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | |||
:{{la|Back Sabbath}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | :{{la|Back Sabbath}} (<span class="plainlinks">]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> | ||
Line 10: | Line 18: | ||
*'''Delete''' per ] and ]. ] (]) 02:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ] and ]. ] (]) 02:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
*'''Delete'''. quickly rm this bunk. ] (]) 15:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. quickly rm this bunk. ] (]) 15:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> |
Revision as of 18:14, 7 July 2008
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Back Sabbath
- Back Sabbath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to fail notability test for music. No independent coverage, major releases or tours which I can verify. Fightindaman (talk) 03:22, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't even claim to be anything other than a cover band --T-rex 03:46, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb 04:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Per Gibb ·Add§hore· /Cont 21:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:MUSIC and WP:N. Happyme22 (talk) 02:28, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. quickly rm this bunk. Libs (talk) 15:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.