| Revision as of 22:11, 12 July 2008 editIridescent (talk | contribs)Administrators402,683 edits →User:Redvers/Say no to Commons: SK← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:50, 12 July 2008 edit undoKelly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers99,890 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Redvers last edited on the 4th July. He indicated that he was busy and therefore unable to discuss his problems with Commons . He also asked you to stop editing his talkpage . Despite the fact that he hasn't edited in the last week, you have decided to nominate a page in his userspace for deletion for the second time. I really would recommend in these cases that you wait for another editor to take action - if a page really should be deleted, surely you won't be the only person willing to nominate it for deletion? It's interesting given that to my knowledge we haven't interacted directly, but from seeing your edits around the wiki, I get the feeling you're someone who has trouble letting go of disagreements with other users. I suggest leaving Redvers alone as I'm finding myself agreeing with his view that you are hounding him. <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 21:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | :Redvers last edited on the 4th July. He indicated that he was busy and therefore unable to discuss his problems with Commons . He also asked you to stop editing his talkpage . Despite the fact that he hasn't edited in the last week, you have decided to nominate a page in his userspace for deletion for the second time. I really would recommend in these cases that you wait for another editor to take action - if a page really should be deleted, surely you won't be the only person willing to nominate it for deletion? It's interesting given that to my knowledge we haven't interacted directly, but from seeing your edits around the wiki, I get the feeling you're someone who has trouble letting go of disagreements with other users. I suggest leaving Redvers alone as I'm finding myself agreeing with his view that you are hounding him. <font face="Verdana">]]</font> 21:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Strong '''Keep''' (if you don't withdraw this as per WJB above). It's only a week since you last nominated this page for deletion - what will have changed in this time?<font face="Trebuchet MS"> – ]]</font> 22:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | :Strong '''Keep''' (if you don't withdraw this as per WJB above). It's only a week since you last nominated this page for deletion - what will have changed in this time?<font face="Trebuchet MS"> – ]]</font> 22:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hmm - WJBscribe has made some kinda-sorta bad-faith allegations above that I've asked him, on his talkpage, to address. That said, I withdrew the previous nom on the belief that this would be addressed in a somewhat expeditous fashion, per Lar's recommendation. It was actually called to the creator's attention long before it was first nominated for deletion. But not the slightest scrap of evidence has yet been offered as a basis for the essay. So, as a Commons editor, and in response to being called an "officious jerk" and "fuck that", I think it would be better if this essay is deleted pending some kind of justifiable argument for its being kept. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:50, 12 July 2008
User:Redvers/Say no to Commons
Disruptive essay that attacks members of a sister project. User has been asked to provide examples of Commons problems for about a month without reply, despite other activity on Misplaced Pages. Kelly 20:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Redvers last edited on the 4th July. He indicated that he was busy and therefore unable to discuss his problems with Commons . He also asked you to stop editing his talkpage . Despite the fact that he hasn't edited in the last week, you have decided to nominate a page in his userspace for deletion for the second time. I really would recommend in these cases that you wait for another editor to take action - if a page really should be deleted, surely you won't be the only person willing to nominate it for deletion? It's interesting given that to my knowledge we haven't interacted directly, but from seeing your edits around the wiki, I get the feeling you're someone who has trouble letting go of disagreements with other users. I suggest leaving Redvers alone as I'm finding myself agreeing with his view that you are hounding him. WjBscribe 21:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Keep (if you don't withdraw this as per WJB above). It's only a week since you last nominated this page for deletion - what will have changed in this time? – iridescent 22:11, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm - WJBscribe has made some kinda-sorta bad-faith allegations above that I've asked him, on his talkpage, to address. That said, I withdrew the previous nom on the belief that this would be addressed in a somewhat expeditous fashion, per Lar's recommendation. It was actually called to the creator's attention long before it was first nominated for deletion. But not the slightest scrap of evidence has yet been offered as a basis for the essay. So, as a Commons editor, and in response to being called an "officious jerk" and "fuck that", I think it would be better if this essay is deleted pending some kind of justifiable argument for its being kept. Kelly 22:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)