| Revision as of 23:46, 30 January 2004 editLir (talk | contribs)10,238 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:46, 30 January 2004 edit undoLir (talk | contribs)10,238 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| I have been removing a lot of the stuff about fascism, because I think the point of this article should be to describe the man, his life, and his ideals, not to classify them. To that end, citations and 'further readings' would be much appreciated. ] 23:08, Jan 30, 2004 (UTC) | I have been removing a lot of the stuff about fascism, because I think the point of this article should be to describe the man, his life, and his ideals, not to classify them. To that end, citations and 'further readings' would be much appreciated. ] 23:08, Jan 30, 2004 (UTC) | ||
| I don't understand a lot of what LaRouche says; he emailed me once, |
I don't understand a lot of what LaRouche says; he emailed me once, after I asked him to simply and concisely outline his political agenda; but he didn't do that. ] | ||
Revision as of 23:46, 30 January 2004
I'm not sure this is really relevant to the article but I had the surprise this evening of seeing billboards promoting Larouche's campaign for presidency in my very own street! _R_ 02:47, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Erm... maybe you won't find this so surprising unless I tell you that I live in Paris (yes, the original one, in France) !
I have been removing a lot of the stuff about fascism, because I think the point of this article should be to describe the man, his life, and his ideals, not to classify them. To that end, citations and 'further readings' would be much appreciated. DanKeshet 23:08, Jan 30, 2004 (UTC)
I don't understand a lot of what LaRouche says; he emailed me once, after I asked him to simply and concisely outline his political agenda; but he didn't do that. Lirath Q. Pynnor