Revision as of 09:24, 15 August 2008 editJuJube (talk | contribs)44,091 edits →I'll be blocked?: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:46, 15 August 2008 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,905 edits Editing adviceNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*Don't be retarded. You're the one that's looking at a block here. Idiot template removed. ] (]) 09:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | *Don't be retarded. You're the one that's looking at a block here. Idiot template removed. ] (]) 09:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Editing advice== | |||
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 09:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:46, 15 August 2008
only put it here if its the wikiproof! this means you collection and masamage! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Recbon (talk • contribs)
I'll be blocked?
- Don't be retarded. You're the one that's looking at a block here. Idiot template removed. JuJube (talk) 09:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Editing advice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 09:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)