Misplaced Pages

User talk:Recbon: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:24, 15 August 2008 editJuJube (talk | contribs)44,091 edits I'll be blocked?: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 09:46, 15 August 2008 edit undoPhilKnight (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators125,905 edits Editing adviceNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


*Don't be retarded. You're the one that's looking at a block here. Idiot template removed. ] (]) 09:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC) *Don't be retarded. You're the one that's looking at a block here. Idiot template removed. ] (]) 09:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

==Editing advice==
] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 09:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:46, 15 August 2008

only put it here if its the wikiproof! this means you collection and masamage! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Recbon (talkcontribs)

I'll be blocked?

Editing advice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. PhilKnight (talk) 09:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)