Misplaced Pages

Biological warfare: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:57, 5 March 2002 editMalcolm Farmer (talk | contribs)5,747 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 05:14, 5 March 2002 edit undo62.253.64.7 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The use of ], ] or other disease-causing organism as a weapon of war. Also known as '''germ warfare'''. The use of ], ] or other disease-causing organism as a weapon of war. Also known as '''germ warfare'''.


Biological warfare is believed to have been practised in the Middle Ages, often by flinging victims of ] over castle Biological warfare is believed to have been practised in the Middle Ages, often by flinging victims of the ] over castle
walls using catapaults. walls using catapaults.


Line 10: Line 10:
The ] reported on ], ] that the United States army has been developing weapons-grade anthrax spores at a biological and chemical weapons facility in Utah at least since ]. The ] reported on ], ] that the United States army has been developing weapons-grade anthrax spores at a biological and chemical weapons facility in Utah at least since ].


Diseases likely to be considered for use as biological weapons include ], ], ] and ] because of their Diseases likely to be considered for use as biological weapons include ], ], ] and ] because of their lethality (if delivered efficiently), and robustness making aerosol delivery feasible.
lethality (if delivered efficiently), and robustness making delivery feasible.


A successful biowarfare attack could theoretically result in thousands, possibly even millions of deaths (though such a catastrophic attack A successful biowarfare attack could theoretically result in thousands, possibly even millions of deaths (though such a catastrophic attack would be difficult to mount with currently-known diseases), and could result in severe disruptions to societies and economies.
would be difficult to mount with currently-known diseases), and could result in severe disruptions to societies and economies.


==== ] ==== ==== ] ====
Numerous ] broke out in the ] in the fall of 2001, caused deliberately. They may well be the first use of biological warfare since the signing of the convention, and possibly the first act of ]. Numerous ] broke out in the ] in the fall of 2001, caused deliberately. They may well be the first use of biological warfare since the signing of the convention, and possibly the first act of ].


----- -----


In the last
<i>Just a few things I learned from surfing the net recently...</i>

The main delivery method for biological weapons is aerosol (ie: droplets). For chemical weapons, it's vapour (much smaller).

Typical chemical warfare agents: sarin, tabun, vx, soman, cyanide, mustard gas

Typical biological warfare agents: anthrax, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB), Bubonic/Pnuemonic Plague, Cholera

An aerosol droplet may contain several bacteria (less than a micron) or many virii (1/100th micron)

] spores (rods) are 6-7 microns in size, which means any HEPA or P100 filter will trap them.

Radiological particulate will also be stopped by a HEPA or P100 filter.

Chemical vapours can be trapped by activated-charcoal filters, but the filter will fill up after about half an hour (depending on unit). Change filter when it gets hard to breathe.

Surgical masks can filter <1/10th micron

In the same way as there's SCUBA for breathing underwater, there are SCBA respirators for breathing pure air above ground.

Ozone neutralizes bological contaminants. Also UV light.

Pyridostigmine is a pre-treatment to most nerve gases, and atropine is the standard antidote (but it causes side effects when you're not first poisoned.)

Anthrax antibiotics = Penicillin, Erethromyacin, Vancromyacin, vancomycin, erythromycin

"Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed" (AVA) immunisation takes 18 months to complete, and then requires annual boosters. Developed by BioPort / Lansing.

A lethal dose of anthrax results from inhaling 10,000-20,000 spores.

---
<b>Links:</b>

$129 EVAC-PRO® SCBA BACK-UP RESPIRATOR
http://store.yahoo.com/1gasmask/evemscbabacr.html

$189 Healthy Wealthy & Wise
http://www.healthywealthyandwise.net/shop/list.html?categ=2

$75 EVAC-U8®mf Emergency Escape Smoke Hood
http://store.yahoo.com/1gasmask/evemessmokho.html

Anthrax Treatment
http://www.emergency.com/anthrax.htm

Health Watch: Cycle Masks
http://www.which.net/whatsnew/pr/june98/health/cycle.html


Naval Toxicology Manual Naval Toxicology Manual
Line 77: Line 23:
Nerve Agents Nerve Agents
http://www.opcw.nl/chemhaz/nerve.htm http://www.opcw.nl/chemhaz/nerve.htm

No Prices - but heaps of Respirators
http://www.afcintl.com/resp.htm


Potomac Institute Course Notes Potomac Institute Course Notes
http://www.potomacinstitute.org/pubs/bt1proc.pdf http://www.potomacinstitute.org/pubs/bt1proc.pdf

respro --
http://www.respro.com/sportsleisure_street.html

Respro -
http://www.respro.com/home.html

Respro Cyclist - Nerve Gas
http://mai.flora.org/forum/11288


Survival-Mindset.com Survival-Mindset.com
Line 104: Line 38:
WHO: Health Aspects of Biological and Chemical Weapons WHO: Health Aspects of Biological and Chemical Weapons
http://www.who.int/emc/pdfs/BIOWEAPONS_FULL_TEXT2.pdf http://www.who.int/emc/pdfs/BIOWEAPONS_FULL_TEXT2.pdf

£29 respro --
http://www.respro.com/urbancommuting_cycling.html

<i>...Well, hope that saved someone else some surfing time!</i>
mailto:Paul.Harvey@cheerful.com

---

Revision as of 05:14, 5 March 2002

The use of bacteria, virus or other disease-causing organism as a weapon of war. Also known as germ warfare.

Biological warfare is believed to have been practised in the Middle Ages, often by flinging victims of the Black Death over castle walls using catapaults.

Use of such weapons was banned in international law by the Geneva convention of 1925. Despite this, considerable research on the topic was performed by the United States, the Soviet Union, and probably other major nations throughout the Cold War era, though it is generally believed such weapons were never used.

The Washington Post reported on December 13, 2001 that the United States army has been developing weapons-grade anthrax spores at a biological and chemical weapons facility in Utah at least since 1992.

Diseases likely to be considered for use as biological weapons include anthrax, pneumonic plague, cholera and smallpox because of their lethality (if delivered efficiently), and robustness making aerosol delivery feasible.

A successful biowarfare attack could theoretically result in thousands, possibly even millions of deaths (though such a catastrophic attack would be difficult to mount with currently-known diseases), and could result in severe disruptions to societies and economies.

2001 anthrax attack

Numerous cases of anthrax broke out in the United States in the fall of 2001, caused deliberately. They may well be the first use of biological warfare since the signing of the convention, and possibly the first act of bioterrorism.


Naval Toxicology Manual http://braddock.com/library/nstm/470v0r3.pdf

Nerve Agents http://www.opcw.nl/chemhaz/nerve.htm

Potomac Institute Course Notes http://www.potomacinstitute.org/pubs/bt1proc.pdf

Survival-Mindset.com http://www.survival-mindset.com/survival_g4.htm

The Terrorist Threat, Parts I, II & III http://www.sgaus.org/dahlke.htm

US Army Treatment Summary Sheet http://www.emergency.com/2001/bio-treatment.htm

WHO: Health Aspects of Biological and Chemical Weapons http://www.who.int/emc/pdfs/BIOWEAPONS_FULL_TEXT2.pdf