Misplaced Pages

Talk:Cornering the market: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:30, 30 August 2008 editHixie (talk | contribs)27 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:43, 30 August 2008 edit undoAngoraFish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,894 edits →why it fails: ReplyNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


This article could do with a better explanation of exactly why this is a risky proposition. ] (]) 09:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC) This article could do with a better explanation of exactly why this is a risky proposition. ] (]) 09:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
:Good suggestion. If you have the time to scratch something together please ] and add it. ] ] 09:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:43, 30 August 2008

WikiProject iconBusiness B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article is WRONG. It is too narrow. Cornering the market is not necessarily illegal. Cornering the Market is to be so successful at at selling or making a particular product that almost no one else sells or makes it. This is per the Cambridge International Dictionary of Idioms © Cambridge University Press 1998. It is not illegal to be successful like that.

What this article is describing is not Cornering the Market but rather, "Manipulating the Market" or something like that. Anyway, it is wrong and it is very bad.--Blue Tie 22:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

The "Great Salad Oil Swindle" is not an example of an attempt to corner the market, it's just plain old fraud. This paragraph should be removed. -ID —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.229.139.228 (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

"Trading Places"--not a good example

The article says the climax of Trading Places involves a scheme to corner the market in frozen concentrated orange juice. This is incorrect; the Dukes' plan is just to make use of inside information (a stolen crop report) to buy the frozen concentrated orange juice at what they think is an artificially low price. Unless I'm mistaken, there's nothing in the movie to indicate that they are attempting to influence the price of FCOJ (though this happens inadvertantly, when other traders see the Dukes buying up FCOJ and assume they know something about the coming crop report).

Unless I hear otherwise, I'll remove this reference. -- Narsil (talk) 18:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

I'd be very happy if you were to remove the reference. Debate 木 22:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

why it fails

This article could do with a better explanation of exactly why this is a risky proposition. Hixie (talk) 09:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Good suggestion. If you have the time to scratch something together please be bold and add it. Debate 木 09:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Categories: