| Revision as of 03:57, 20 September 2005 editTitoxd (talk | contribs)43,130 editsm rv nonsense ("asdfasdf")← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:11, 21 December 2005 edit undoWelshy (talk | contribs)173 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::What, no picture to accompany the article? How are we young'uns supposed to learn if there are no visuals for reference? Tut. Sigh. Off now to watch more porn. Bye. | ::What, no picture to accompany the article? How are we young'uns supposed to learn if there are no visuals for reference? Tut. Sigh. Off now to watch more porn. Bye. | ||
| :::I don't really think sarcasm is necessary here. As for no picture, I think the description is more than adequate ] 20:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:11, 21 December 2005
Here is a quote from this article: Some people consider this act disrespectful to the person on the receiving end, although some people do receive sexual pleasure from it, and some claim that since the human face is an amalgam of our most unique physical characteristics - it is an expression of the desire to copulate directly with the most intimate part of one's partner. Whether it is really an act of disrespect depends on the mutual perceptions and intentions of the participants. What do you believe?
Does anyone know where there is related information (book, webpage, other) similar to this article.
i think this line
"The people that claim a facial is "disrespectul" and don't engage in it however, are most likely very conservative people who refuse to explore and experience in life."
is a little 'disrespectful' towards people who don't enjoy the act - it doesn't make them conservative, it just means they may not like it !
It is OK to consider this act as a substitute sex act for those girls who are not yet ready to engage in other sexual activities. In my experience most girls like to remain passive while ejaculation on their face is occuring, mostly to avoid other areas, specially their hair, from receiving the semen
- What, no picture to accompany the article? How are we young'uns supposed to learn if there are no visuals for reference? Tut. Sigh. Off now to watch more porn. Bye.
- I don't really think sarcasm is necessary here. As for no picture, I think the description is more than adequate Welshy 20:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)