| Revision as of 09:26, 21 September 2005 editShimbo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,143 edits Battle of the Beams← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:13, 29 September 2005 edit undoPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits Requested moveNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{move|Blitz}} | |||
| ''An event mentioned in this article is a ]''. | ''An event mentioned in this article is a ]''. | ||
| --------- | --------- | ||
| Line 34: | Line 36: | ||
| There is a section in the ] article about the German use of beams to guide their aircraft. I think this would be more apropriate as part of this article as they were mostly used at night during the blitz.] 09:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC) | There is a section in the ] article about the German use of beams to guide their aircraft. I think this would be more apropriate as part of this article as they were mostly used at night during the blitz.] 09:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ==Requested move== | |||
| ] → ]. ] --] 11:13, 29 September 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| :''Add *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''' followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>'' | |||
| ===Discussion=== | |||
| :''Add any additional comments'' | |||
Revision as of 11:13, 29 September 2005
This template must be substituted. Replace {{Requested move ...}} with {{subst:Requested move ...}}.
An event mentioned in this article is a September 7 selected anniversary.
To anonymous deleter: I put back the text you deleted from this article because I could see no reason why it shold be removed. If you think there is a reason why it should be deleted, feel free to explain here. DJ Clayworth 13:54, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Was it a single German bomber that accidentally dropped its load over London on Aug 24 1940 or were there several aircraft involved in this incident? I've seem to remember hearing that it was a single bomber, but http://www.onwar.com/chrono/1940/aug40/24aug40.htm suggests that there were several aircraft involved. Jooler 18:02, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
the Blitz, The Blitz?
Isn't "the Blitz" the more common capitalisation, rather than "The Blitz"?
Who Won?
Firstly the title of this section is awful. I don't like seeing questions in encyclopaedia articles like this, and it is such a glib phrase. Secondly the analysis given in the whole section is a load of cobblers. Jooler 23:13, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
1800 Megaton bombs??
"15th November 1940 - the Luftwaffe returns to London hitting almost every borough. It uses a new bomb nicknamed Satan - it was huge - 1800 megatons of high explosive and it was a delayed action bomb. " 1800 Megatons? I don't think so. I'll remove that information. Do "delayed action bombs" exist? If anybody believes to know more about the subject, please rectify.--Malbi 18:50, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- There were such things as delayed action bombs. Obviously not of that size though. What they were nicknamed I've no idea. Shimbo 09:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Blitzkrieg
the German word Blitzkrieg, doesn't mean "Lightning War", but "Fast War", suddenly and fast as a flash...
The Blitz
How ironic it seems that the London subway was a safe shelter during The Blitz and lately it proved to be the most risky place to be because of fanatics concealing explosives while they ride the tube.Musicwriter 20:14, 7 September 2005 (UTC).
The Battle of the Beams
There is a section in the Battle of Britain article about the German use of beams to guide their aircraft. I think this would be more apropriate as part of this article as they were mostly used at night during the blitz.Shimbo 09:26, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Requested move
The Blitz → Blitz. Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions#Avoid the definite article ("the") and the indefinite article ("a"/"an") at the beginning of the page name --Philip Baird Shearer 11:13, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
Discussion
- Add any additional comments