| Revision as of 20:13, 7 September 2008 edit86.163.153.184 (talk) →bias← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:18, 7 September 2008 edit undoEnigma Blues (talk | contribs)541 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Hi im not sure what merge means could you explain what it involves and will POK be included ] (]) 20:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | Hi im not sure what merge means could you explain what it involves and will POK be included ] (]) 20:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :It means that in my opinion, the term should be mentioned in the ] article and also some of the content, if need be. --] (]) 20:18, 7 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Indo-Us Nuc deal artilce split == | == Indo-Us Nuc deal artilce split == | ||
| Good idea. I had it earlier but somehow did not get much support at that time. <FONT FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="+1" Color="#FF0000">]</FONT><sup><FONT FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" SIZE="+1" Color="blue">]</FONT></sup> 19:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | Good idea. I had it earlier but somehow did not get much support at that time. <FONT FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="+1" Color="#FF0000">]</FONT><sup><FONT FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" SIZE="+1" Color="blue">]</FONT></sup> 19:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == Notice == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''Notice to Indian Wikipedians''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | HELLO {{pagename}} Please save ] article from deletion. The article has been hijacked by Wikipedians of Pakistani origin who are demanding its deletion. Remember, once deleted its gonna be extremely hard to recreate it. This is not a wasted attempt because all claims in the article are well sourced. Please consider the following: | |||
| <br><br> | |||
| 1. Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir is the term used by the Indian government, and for legal reasons followed by the media and Indian publishers<br><br> | |||
| 2. The term is POV on Misplaced Pages, but it is real, because it exists, and cannot be *deleted* away.<br><br> | |||
| 3. Redirecting PoK to Azad Kashmir is not the solution. Geographically, Azad Kashmir is a small region of the area labelled as PoK. Therefore, territorially speaking, it is inherently false.<br><br> | |||
| 4. Additionally, the term Azad, which means free, is also a POV. Free in what sense? From Indian administration?<br><br> | |||
| 5. As a responsible encyclopedia, it is our responsibility to mention what the term means, the area under it, who has dubbed the name, usage of the name, the reasons why it is called, and legal usage in India, Pakistan, and major countries/groups. The page should not be more than two-three paragraphs long, and must point to the articles on Jammu and Kashmir, Kashmir, the Kashmir dispute, Azad Kashmir, and FANA.<br><br> | |||
| Wikipedians of Pakistani origin want this removed and replaced with just the ] and ] article because it speaks the truth. Anybody with an account can vote. If none please right away and vote for <B><font color= green>keep</font color= green></B>. | |||
| PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE BEFORE VOTING. a similar warning is on wp:india page | |||
| Please oppose the page to be <B><font color= Red>deleted</font color= Red></B>. It is requested by Pro Pakistani Wikipedians who want all trace of it to be vanished. ]. Key in <B><font color= green>keep</font color= green></B> followed by reason. | |||
Revision as of 20:18, 7 September 2008
Archives
- I will usually reply on your talk page.
- I might take some time to respond to your queries or concerns.
- Maintain civility while posting your comments here.
 | |
| Misplaced Pages ads | file info – show another – #140 |
bias
86.153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see and . help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.31.145 (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi im not sure what merge means could you explain what it involves and will POK be included 86.163.153.184 (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- It means that in my opinion, the term should be mentioned in the Pakistan-administered Kashmir article and also some of the content, if need be. --Enigma Blues (talk) 20:18, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Indo-Us Nuc deal artilce split
Good idea. I had proposed it earlier but somehow did not get much support at that time. Docku 19:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)