Misplaced Pages

User talk:82.44.82.115: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 9 September 2008 editArcayne (talk | contribs)Rollbackers26,574 edits →Canon: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 16:17, 9 September 2008 edit undoArcayne (talk | contribs)Rollbackers26,574 edits →Edit -warring (3RR warning): new sectionNext edit →
Line 18: Line 18:


We don't use it here. It has no value whatsoever. The coin of the realm in Misplaced Pages is Verifiability, Notability and Reliability. Citations are the only thing we rely upon. If someone writes a citable article talking about how Kirk and Spock make creepy monkey pon-farr in the backseat of 65 Buick, then we can include it. The litmus for inclusion is citability, not truth. Fortunately, there are other sources which overwhelm the other citable info and thus can be removed under the argument of ]. Imdb is not a reliable, citable source. - ] ] 15:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC) We don't use it here. It has no value whatsoever. The coin of the realm in Misplaced Pages is Verifiability, Notability and Reliability. Citations are the only thing we rely upon. If someone writes a citable article talking about how Kirk and Spock make creepy monkey pon-farr in the backseat of 65 Buick, then we can include it. The litmus for inclusion is citability, not truth. Fortunately, there are other sources which overwhelm the other citable info and thus can be removed under the argument of ]. Imdb is not a reliable, citable source. - ] ] 15:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

== Edit -warring (3RR warning) ==

Please stop. Your opinion, while polite, has not found a consensus in the article discussion, and further attempts to include information about canon or other fannish concepts against consensus ''will'' likely result in a block for ]. I would urge you to find (or build) a consensus ''before'' re-adding the information. Look at the matter another way: you are not convincing at least three other people who disagree with you, and they will revert your adding this information. You need to be aware that these reverts are ''not'' vandalism, as you have characterized it . You are not going to be able to revert and add the material in again without violating ].<br>
You are in fact in violation of 3RR currently, and you could be reported and blocked for this infraction. Please review the 3RR policies and make no more reverts to the article for 24 hours. If you do, you will be reported at ], and subsequently blocked. <br>
If you need help understanding our policies and guidelines, please ask. Charging forth like a bull in a china shop will prove to be an expensive misbehavior for yourself. - ] ] 16:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:17, 9 September 2008

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (82.44.82.115) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Soaringgoldeneagle (talk) 09:38, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Canon

We don't use it here. It has no value whatsoever. The coin of the realm in Misplaced Pages is Verifiability, Notability and Reliability. Citations are the only thing we rely upon. If someone writes a citable article talking about how Kirk and Spock make creepy monkey pon-farr in the backseat of 65 Buick, then we can include it. The litmus for inclusion is citability, not truth. Fortunately, there are other sources which overwhelm the other citable info and thus can be removed under the argument of undue weight. Imdb is not a reliable, citable source. - Arcayne () 15:49, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Edit -warring (3RR warning)

Please stop. Your opinion, while polite, has not found a consensus in the article discussion, and further attempts to include information about canon or other fannish concepts against consensus will likely result in a block for edit-warring. I would urge you to find (or build) a consensus before re-adding the information. Look at the matter another way: you are not convincing at least three other people who disagree with you, and they will revert your adding this information. You need to be aware that these reverts are not vandalism, as you have characterized it here. You are not going to be able to revert and add the material in again without violating 3RR.
You are in fact in violation of 3RR currently, and you could be reported and blocked for this infraction. Please review the 3RR policies and make no more reverts to the article for 24 hours. If you do, you will be reported at WP:AIV, and subsequently blocked.
If you need help understanding our policies and guidelines, please ask. Charging forth like a bull in a china shop will prove to be an expensive misbehavior for yourself. - Arcayne () 16:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)