Revision as of 21:19, 19 September 2008 editMoreschi (talk | contribs)19,434 edits →User notice: temporary 3RR block: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:44, 20 September 2008 edit undoYMB29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,352 edits →User notice: temporary 3RR blockNext edit → | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | <div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | ||
{{unblock|Why was I blocked for 48 hours for 3RR (1st time)? Just because a user accuses me of incivility, being a sock, and making reverts against consensus? Is not that supposed to be investigated first before doing anything? | |||
Also, my reverts] were made to restore legitimate content, including sourced information and neutral language required by Misplaced Pages that the other user simply removes. I could not discuss the changes anymore because the other user keeps on failing to respond to discussion of the issues and just reverts, saying that his version is the one with consensus.}} | |||
==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | ==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | ||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 21:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 48 hours. ] (]) 21:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)</div> | <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{#if:|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ]{{#if:| at ]}}. Please be more careful to ] or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{#if:|] (]) 21:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> The duration of the is 48 hours. ] (]) 21:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)</div> |
Revision as of 22:44, 20 September 2008
Hello and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Hope you like it here, and stick around.
Here are some tips to help you get started:
- To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
- Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
- If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
- Follow the Misplaced Pages:Simplified Ruleset
- Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
- Remember Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view
- Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!
Good luck!
Meelar (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
Welcome!
If you are interested in Russia-related themes, you may want to check out the Russian Portal, particularly the Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Misplaced Pages notice board. You may even want to add these boards to your watchlist.
Again, welcome! abakharev 05:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Civility
Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Edit summaries like reverted edits by a nazi sympathizer are unacceptable abakharev 05:20, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Relax
Calm down! "Nazi Symphatisator"? "Sily"? You will get blocked is that what you want??
- "Nazi Sympathizer" was two years ago. -YMB29 (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Я тоже Русский, и согласен с тобой! Ну чтобы выжить в Википедии надо искать нетральность. Ну выругаешь ты его, и что? Тебя блокируют нахрен и все, он будет радоваться! Нужно тебе это?? Культурно спорь, даже не с культурными людьми. Это всего лишь Википедия. Спокойнее! Знаешь сколько тут западников которые с радостью заблакируют всех Руских и привратят Википедию в свой агитационный ларек? Ну дашь им причину блокировать тебя! Кому от этого легче станет? Спокойнее! Тебя никто не торопит. Kostan1 (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
- Я знаю, но за "silly" меня не заблокируют. -YMB29 (talk) 01:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
- Please enter the talk page of the article. Kostan1 (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
I uploaded the new version
Hope you agree on it. Kostan1 (talk) 11:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
I owe you an apology
I'm sorry for taking you as the POV pusher in the article and for speaking to you with rudness. The reverts that Biophys just did, while at the same time you chose the talk page to bring up the points you don't agree with clearly showed me who is the POV pusher. I'm sorry. Kostan1 (talk) 13:43, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry you were not rude. I don't know what we are going to do with Biophys; talking to him is like banging your head against the wall... -YMB29 (talk) 00:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
P.S. Please bring a link saying the NKVD Order No. 00689 lasted only for two years. Kostan1 (talk) 13:59, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
- I linked the article in my version and on the talk page. NKVD Order No. 00689 changed NKVD Order No. 00486. -YMB29 (talk) 00:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
A barnstar (your first?)
The Original Barnstar | ||
For helping to bring the Human rights in the Soviet Union to an NPOV, for being civil and using the talk page for things you don't agree with, for reverting a user who clearly pushes his NPOV into the nutral version, even though you yourself don't agree with many things in it. In other words, for maturity. Continue to be a great user! Kostan1 (talk) 11:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC) |
- Thank you. -YMB29 (talk) 04:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
No headline
If you want, you don't have to, you can also say what you think here. Kostan1 (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
This user is asking that his block be reviewed:
YMB29 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why was I blocked for 48 hours for 3RR (1st time)? Just because a user accuses me of incivility, being a sock, and making reverts against consensus? Is not that supposed to be investigated first before doing anything? Also, my reverts] were made to restore legitimate content, including sourced information and neutral language required by Misplaced Pages that the other user simply removes. I could not discuss the changes anymore because the other user keeps on failing to respond to discussion of the issues and just reverts, saying that his version is the one with consensus.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why was I blocked for 48 hours for 3RR (1st time)? Just because a user accuses me of incivility, being a sock, and making reverts against consensus? Is not that supposed to be investigated first before doing anything? Also, my reverts] were made to restore legitimate content, including sourced information and neutral language required by Misplaced Pages that the other user simply removes. I could not discuss the changes anymore because the other user keeps on failing to respond to discussion of the issues and just reverts, saying that his version is the one with consensus. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked for 48 hours for 3RR (1st time)? Just because a user accuses me of incivility, being a sock, and making reverts against consensus? Is not that supposed to be investigated first before doing anything? Also, my reverts] were made to restore legitimate content, including sourced information and neutral language required by Misplaced Pages that the other user simply removes. I could not discuss the changes anymore because the other user keeps on failing to respond to discussion of the issues and just reverts, saying that his version is the one with consensus. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why was I blocked for 48 hours for 3RR (1st time)? Just because a user accuses me of incivility, being a sock, and making reverts against consensus? Is not that supposed to be investigated first before doing anything? Also, my reverts] were made to restore legitimate content, including sourced information and neutral language required by Misplaced Pages that the other user simply removes. I could not discuss the changes anymore because the other user keeps on failing to respond to discussion of the issues and just reverts, saying that his version is the one with consensus. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}