Misplaced Pages

User talk:Townlake: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:56, 26 September 2008 editSoWhy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators62,327 edits Your comment on my RfA about the layout on my userpage: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:14, 26 September 2008 edit undoTownlake (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,827 edits Your comment on my RfA about the layout on my userpage: replyNext edit →
Line 59: Line 59:


Hi there, I had replied to your comment on my RfA but now I reordered them on my userpage, using a scrolling div-container. I have only IE6 on my PC (which comes with XP) but if you have other browsers (like IE7), could you take a look and see if you spot any problems with that new layout? I'd value your input in that matter. Regards ''']]''' 17:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC) Hi there, I had replied to your comment on my RfA but now I reordered them on my userpage, using a scrolling div-container. I have only IE6 on my PC (which comes with XP) but if you have other browsers (like IE7), could you take a look and see if you spot any problems with that new layout? I'd value your input in that matter. Regards ''']]''' 17:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
*Thanks for responding to my RfA comment so quickly. I'm currently on my IE7 comp, saw no issues with the new userbox-box layout; will try from my IE6 comp tonight and make sure it works there too. (I felt a little silly dinging you for that, but appearances do matter... if I switch, which I may well do now, it'll likely be to support. I'm glad the discussion seems to be going well for you, and I applaud your eagerness to address the concerns people have raised.) ] (]) 21:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:14, 26 September 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Townlake, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your !vote at my RFA

Thanks!
Thanks!

Thank you, Townlake, for your support !vote at my RFA. I will be doing my best to make sure that your confidence has not been misplaced. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 90 support, 2 oppose, and 0 neutral.

All the best, Ben MacDui/Walk 20:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Ashley Cheadle

Heh, I was only doing my job. As for the tag - an error on my part, I must have forgotten - it's gone now. Thanks for contributing, hopefully that article will continue to improve! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 07:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Allegations of apartheid deletion notification

Some time ago, you participated in a deletion discussion concerning Allegations of Israeli apartheid. I thought you might like to know that the parent article, Allegations of apartheid, was recently nominated for deletion. Given that many of the issues that have been raised are essentially the same as those on the article on which you commented earlier, you may have a view on whether Allegations of apartheid should be kept or deleted. If you wish to contribute to the discussion, please see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination). -- ChrisO (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Tagged: The Jonathan Wamback Story

I have no idea why, but Twinkle always makes the afd template show up red linked. Purging the cache fixes it. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters18:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability discussions

The baseball notability guidelines are under discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Baseball, you may be interested in participating. Spanneraol (talk) 19:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Townlake, thank you for your contribution to the discussion at my recent RfA. In particular I wanted to thank you for remarking on my answer to Q10 very soon after I had posted it; I appreciated that feedback so much. If ever you have any concerns about my actions, adminly or otherwise, don't hesitate to let me know. Best wishes, Paul Erik 23:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Tipping Point

I was hoping you could reassess the changes to the article, to see whether the balance is more appropriate.

Thanks,

Duuude007 (talk) 03:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

wasilla church

Hello, Townlake. You have new messages at Balloonman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your awfully knee jerk desire to delete the "Batman's career timeline" article challenged

Batman is one of the most iconic, recognizable characters in all of comics. He has been around since 1939 and has had numerous adaptions made about him (via animation, live-action television and film, and video games). It would do the character more good (in terms of serving as a relatively important history lesson) than you could imagine to showcase a "career timeline" through all of the important eras/ages in the comics. Besides, if you're going to delete this article about Batman's career timeline and more importantly, his evolution as a superhero/crime fighter, then you might as well do the same about the article entitled "History of Superman". TMC1982 (talk) 7:24 p.m., 9 September 2008 (UTC)

FYI, my own response to this is here.  Frank  |  talk  15:04, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Your comment on my RfA about the layout on my userpage

Hi there, I had replied to your comment on my RfA but now I reordered them on my userpage, using a scrolling div-container. I have only IE6 on my PC (which comes with XP) but if you have other browsers (like IE7), could you take a look and see if you spot any problems with that new layout? I'd value your input in that matter. Regards SoWhy 17:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Thanks for responding to my RfA comment so quickly. I'm currently on my IE7 comp, saw no issues with the new userbox-box layout; will try from my IE6 comp tonight and make sure it works there too. (I felt a little silly dinging you for that, but appearances do matter... if I switch, which I may well do now, it'll likely be to support. I'm glad the discussion seems to be going well for you, and I applaud your eagerness to address the concerns people have raised.) Townlake (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)