User talk:QuackGuru: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 18:47, 29 September 2008 editQuackGuru (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits It is clear-cut. We can explain neutrally all significant viewpoints per NPOV. See Talk:John McCain#U.S. citizenship and the Presidency ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:15, 30 September 2008 edit undoFT2 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 edits →Involved and uninvolved admins: new sectionNext edit →
Line 62:		Line 62:
	\|}		\|}
	\|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->		\|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->

			== Involved and uninvolved admins ==

			Without starting a new thread on the topic, a very specific notice on the multiple threads related to ].

			As this was an inquiry on an Arbitration remedy, I have kept an eye on this issue. I notice that you have been verging on ] arguing on this. You have been told this by a number of users but ignored them. Specific issues that I notice that suggest tendentiousness:

			# You presented initially claiming to show Elonka's involvement. Your description indicated these were evidence of being in a content dispute. These were each spurious - when examined the first was about civility, editors' roles and some content issues others need to attend to, and the other two about editor conduct. None of these three shows any significant involvement in the topic beyond that of an administrative nature.
			# '''EdJohnston''' and <br />'''MBisanz''' <br />both told you these showed nothing of the kind on that talk page, '''as did I''' at ] .
			# The next day you you had already been told were irrelevant, this time at ], again stating they showed a "content dispute", adding two more that you claimed showed an "edit war". A check on these showed they related to use of formatting (MOS) matters only - ie should some words be linked or not.
			# '''Erachima''' , <br />'''Lifebaka''' , <br />'''DigitalC''' , and <br />'''Jayvdb''' <br />then all posted there saying inbrief that none of these showed a content dispute.
			# '''JzG''' indicated you were becoming tendentious, and simply told you to ] .
			# Despite being told twice now that the diffs showed nothing, and being told to let go of the matter, you then returned yet again, in yet another venue, to Elonka from the admin page with the narrative linking to that AN discussion, even though the AN discussion you linked to showed no agreement, contained diffs you had now been repeatedly told showed no issue, and contained both JzG and Jayvdb's comments to the effect that you appeared to be trying to create something out of nothing and this should end.

			Thanks for understanding. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] \| ])</span></sup> 01:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:15, 30 September 2008

Welcome!

Hello, QuackGuru! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Misplaced Pages. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Misplaced Pages you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 01:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Getting Started
Misplaced Pages Tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Involved and uninvolved admins

Without starting a new thread on the topic, a very specific notice on the multiple threads related to Chiropractic.

As this was an inquiry on an Arbitration remedy, I have kept an eye on this issue. I notice that you have been verging on tendentiously arguing on this. You have been told this by a number of users but ignored them. Specific issues that I notice that suggest tendentiousness:

You presented initially three diffs claiming to show Elonka's involvement. Your description indicated these were evidence of being in a content dispute. These were each spurious - when examined the first was about civility, editors' roles and some content issues others need to attend to, and the other two about editor conduct. None of these three shows any significant involvement in the topic beyond that of an administrative nature.
EdJohnston and
MBisanz
both told you these showed nothing of the kind on that talk page, as did I at WP:AN .
The next day you posted the exact same 3 diffs you had already been told were irrelevant, this time at WP:AN, again stating they showed a "content dispute", adding two more that you claimed showed an "edit war". A check on these showed they related to use of formatting (MOS) matters only - ie should some words be linked or not.
Erachima ,
Lifebaka ,
DigitalC , and
Jayvdb
then all posted there saying inbrief that none of these showed a content dispute.
JzG indicated you were becoming tendentious, and simply told you to Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass .
Despite being told twice now that the diffs showed nothing, and being told to let go of the matter, you then returned yet again, in yet another venue, to remove Elonka from the admin page with the narrative linking to that AN discussion, even though the AN discussion you linked to showed no agreement, contained diffs you had now been repeatedly told showed no issue, and contained both JzG and Jayvdb's comments to the effect that you appeared to be trying to create something out of nothing and this should end.

Thanks for understanding. FT2 01:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)