Revision as of 01:17, 30 September 2008 editFT2 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 editsm →Involved and uninvolved admins: tweak← Previous edit |
Revision as of 01:18, 30 September 2008 edit undoFT2 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 editsm →Involved and uninvolved admins: tweakNext edit → |
Line 74: |
Line 74: |
|
# '''Erachima''' , <br />'''Lifebaka''' , <br />'''DigitalC''' , and <br />'''Jayvdb''' <br />then all posted there saying inbrief that none of these showed a content dispute. |
|
# '''Erachima''' , <br />'''Lifebaka''' , <br />'''DigitalC''' , and <br />'''Jayvdb''' <br />then all posted there saying inbrief that none of these showed a content dispute. |
|
# '''JzG''' indicated you were becoming tendentious, and simply told you to ] . |
|
# '''JzG''' indicated you were becoming tendentious, and simply told you to ] . |
|
# Despite being told twice now that the diffs showed nothing, and being told to let go of the matter, you then returned yet again, in yet another venue, to Elonka from the admin page with the narrative linking to the AN discussion containing those identical diffs a ''third'' time, even though the linked discussion showed no agreement, contained diffs you had now been repeatedly told showed no issue, and contained both JzG and Jayvdb's comments to the effect that you appeared to be trying to create something out of nothing and this should end. |
|
# Despite being told twice now that the diffs showed nothing, and being told to let go of the matter, you then returned yet again, in yet another venue, to Elonka from the admin page. The edit summary linked the user to the same AN discussion containing those identical diffs (a ''third'' time now!), even though the linked discussion showed no agreement, and contained both JzG and Jayvdb's comments to the effect that you appeared to be trying to create something out of nothing and this should end''. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for understanding. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] | ])</span></sup> 01:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
|
Thanks for understanding. ] <sup><span style="font-style:italic">(] | ])</span></sup> 01:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC) |
Without starting a new thread on the topic, a very specific notice on the multiple threads related to Chiropractic.
As this was an inquiry on an Arbitration remedy, I have kept an eye on this issue. I notice that you have been verging on tendentiously arguing on this. You have been told this by a number of users but ignored them. Specific issues that I notice that suggest tendentiousness: