Misplaced Pages

Talk:2000 Sugar Bowl: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:29, 18 October 2008 editGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm Bot updating {{ArticleHistory}}← Previous edit Revision as of 12:21, 22 October 2008 edit undoJKBrooks85 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,779 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{fac}}
{{ArticleHistory {{ArticleHistory
|action1=GAN |action1=GAN

Revision as of 12:21, 22 October 2008

{{FAC}} should be substituted at the top of the article talk page

Good article2000 Sugar Bowl has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 16, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 4, 2008.
WikiProject iconCollege football GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2000 Sugar Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'd like the following to be fixed:

  • Could Florida State's Defense be expanded? Feels lacking compared to sections in this and other articles.

That being said, this is another great article by you, and I'm actually going to pass it the expansion request isn't really a pass/fail situation. Wizardman 16:29, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Categories: